Supported byClarion Energy
HomeElectricitySerbia shifts to...

Serbia shifts to net imports as SEEPEX day-ahead prices rise in May 2026

Electricity.Trade’s May 2026 market analysis places Serbia among the most significant electricity trading developments in the Western Balkans. On the SEEPEX exchange, the average day-ahead price increased to €96.63/MWh. The level was up 5.59% versus April and 8.50% compared with May 2025. Trading activity and volumes were highlighted alongside the price movement .

SEEPEX reported 566.3 GWh of traded volume during May. This represented a 16.99% increase month on month and a 13.31% rise year on year. The data pointed to improving market liquidity during the period. The same month also coincided with Serbia moving into a net electricity importer position .

May 2026 physical balance: higher demand, weaker hydropower

Serbia’s physical market balance changed materially in May. Net electricity imports reached 422.97 GWh as electricity demand increased and domestic hydropower production weakened. Power consumption rose by 4.26% from April, described as one of the strongest monthly demand increases across Southeast Europe. Hydropower generation fell by 31.68%, reducing operational flexibility .

Renewable generation increased by 2.90% over the same period. The increase was not sufficient to offset the decline in hydro output alongside stronger electricity demand. As a result, import dependence increased during a month when hydropower contributed less to supply .

Generation mix and implications for wholesale pricing dynamics

Serbia’s generation mix in May remained dominated by coal and lignite. Coal and lignite accounted for 56.99% of total generation, while hydropower contributed 33.49%. Renewables made up 8.26% of generation, and natural gas represented 0.43%. The mix differentiates Serbia from systems where gas-fired generation plays a larger role in setting wholesale prices .

Coal provided a stable baseload supply during the month, while lower hydropower output constrained system flexibility. With reduced hydro availability, Serbia relied more on imports during periods of higher demand. This interaction between generation composition and import needs was reflected in the May net import figure .

Cross-border flows: imports from multiple neighbours, exports limited to Croatia

Cross-border electricity trade expanded across the month as Serbia adjusted its supply-demand balance through interconnections. Imports came from Hungary, Bulgaria, North Macedonia, Kosovo, Montenegro and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Exports were directed only to Croatia during May .

The range of import origins reflected growing integration with neighbouring electricity markets in Southeast Europe. It also pointed to the role of cross-border transmission capacity and congestion management for day-ahead trading outcomes . Efficient day-ahead trading was cited as a factor supporting balancing between domestic supply and demand.

Supported byClarion Owners Engineers
Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Djerdap 3 pumped-storage: Bechtel-Enka qualifies as Serbia prepares planning

Serbia has advanced work on the proposed Djerdap 3 pumped-storage hydropower project, with a Bechtel-Enka consortium qualifying for the next stage of government negotiations. At the same time, a Serbian engineering consortium is preparing the project’s planning framework. The...

Domestic industrial PPAs open new revenue opportunities for Serbian and Montenegrin renewables

Domestic industrial demand can support renewable investment and improve electricity cost predictability, but the carbon value of a power purchase agreement depends on the products being exported and the emissions rules governing them. Renewable developers in Serbia and Montenegro have...

Serbian renewable projects face new contractual challenges on the Hungary export corridor

Export PPAs can expand market access for wind and solar projects, but the revenue ultimately reaching developers depends on delivery rights, trading costs and the share of output that qualifies for actual-emissions treatment. Serbian wind and solar developers targeting Hungarian...
Supported byVirtu Energy