Supported byClarion Energy
HomeNuclearHungary, Rosatom is...

Hungary, Rosatom is reportedly withdrawing from the Paks project

Russia’s nuclear company Rosatom has reportedly informed the Russian government of its intention to withdraw from the Paks nuclear power plant expansion project due to force majeure, 24hu reports, citing Russian sources citing Alexei Likhachev, Rosatom’s CEO.

The expansion of NE Pax, the largest Hungarian investment of all time, envisions the Russian state nuclear energy group Rosatom building two new reactors as part of a 12.5 billion-euro project based on a 2014 intergovernmental agreement. Russia has secured a 10 billion-euro loan to finance 80% of the costs.

According to sources, Russia no longer supports the investment, the realization of which could be hampered by sanctions. No further details are known.

Minister without portfolio in charge of project expansion Janos Suli did not answer questions about this news.

On the other hand, Rosatom General Director for Central Europe Zalan Bac denied the reports. Implementation of the Paks 2 project will continue as planned and Rosatom is fully meeting its contractual obligations under the Russian-Hungarian intergovernmental loan agreement, including securing project financing, he added.

Hungary has raised a loan of 10 billion euros from Vnesheconombank (VEB), but due to sanctions, the Russian lender cannot transfer funds to the state development bank MFB. In order to avoid that, VEB should transfer loans through Rosatom to Russian territory, Bach said.

The project has been delayed for several years, as Hungarian nuclear regulator OAH has yet to issue a final permit due to security concerns. There appear to be problems with alignment with Rosatom’s VVER-1200 reactors, experts say.

Earlier this month, Likhachev said that the works on the upgrade of the nuclear power plant were going according to plan and that it would be put into operation in 2029-2030. years.

The nuclear project, in general, is not dead yet, but Rosatom’s space is limited due to sanctions and the war in Ukraine, Attila Aszodi, former state secretary in charge of the project, told local media. He also stressed that Hungary has signed a good agreement for the project on a turnkey basis with a fixed price. If, for any reason, the Russians exceed the budget, they bear the risks, he added.

Other analysts predict that, even if Hungary sticks to Rosatom, the Pax 2 project would still be at enormous risk as Western companies would likely refrain from cooperating on a major project with a Russian contractor.

In 2018, GE Hungary, a subsidiary of General Electric, won a contract worth 793 million euros for the production and delivery of turbines for two new units.

The government believes that Hungary needs nuclear energy in order to achieve security of supply and meet climate policy goals. By 2030, about 90% of the country’s electricity production could be CO2-free.

NE Paks covers half of Hungary’s electricity production.

Source: bne.eu

Supported byClarion Owners Engineers
Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Hungary tenders 702 MVA grid capacity for new wind projects

Hungary has launched a tender for 702 MVA of grid connection capacity reserved for new wind projects. The allocation is intended to reopen access to grid capacity after a period in which wind development remained largely frozen while solar...

Hungary tenders 702 MVA grid capacity for new wind farm connections

Hungary has released 702 MVA of grid capacity for new wind projects and opened a tender for wind farm grid connections. The offering provides developers with 702 MVA of combined network capacity as the country seeks to restart wind...

Hungary’s higher gas use and imports strengthen its power price premium

Hungary remained one of Southeast Europe’s most expensive electricity markets in Week 34, as a sharp increase in thermal generation coincided with a substantial rise in net electricity imports. The combination points to supply-side economics, rather than stronger demand,...
Supported byVirtu Energy