Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsCongestion-driven transmission constraints...

Congestion-driven transmission constraints reshape Southeast Europe power markets

The first half of May 2026 was marked by a regional shift toward congestion-led market behavior. Prices rose sharply even as demand fell, while solar output increased without preventing higher system prices. Cross-border flows changed materially and several corridors showed signs of tightening, reversal or structural imbalance. The pattern pointed to electricity value increasingly depending on whether power can reach the right market at the right hour.

Net exports across the broader HU+SEE system deteriorated from -767 MW to -1,170 MW, indicating greater import dependence during the observed period. Flows toward Italy moved from +310 MW to -148 MW. The Bulgaria–North Macedonia–Albania position toward Greece worsened to -1,129 MW. The next major energy constraint in Southeastern Europe will not be generation. It will be transmission.

Cross-border flexibility and corridor imbalances

Cross-border flexibility has historically helped smooth national generation imbalances across the Balkans. Hydro-rich systems exported during favorable hydrology, while coal-heavy systems provided baseload. Greece, Italy, Hungary and Romania have acted as price anchors depending on season, weather and fuel spreads. That structure is becoming less predictable as corridor conditions tighten.

The region is also facing multiple overlapping pressures that affect physical delivery and balancing needs. Solar capacity is growing faster than grid reinforcement, while coal plants are becoming less reliable. Nuclear outages have a stronger price impact and hydro output is less consistently monetizable. Gas is returning as the marginal balancing fuel, and CBAM is altering buyer behavior for Western Balkan electricity.

At the same time, cross-border capacity remains constrained by old network design, slow permitting and fragmented national investment planning. Congestion is therefore described as both a risk and a potential revenue source for market participants. Traders face congestion-driven spreads, developers face curtailment risk and banks face uncertainty around captured prices. TSOs experience operational stress as governments face political pressure linked to renewable projects waiting for grid access.

Regional price spreads in early May 2026

Romania’s OPCOM averaged €115.88/MWh in the first half of May and traded at a €7.65/MWh premium to Hungary’s HUPX. Bulgaria’s IBEX averaged €104.98/MWh, Croatia’s CROPEX €105.77/MWh, Slovenia’s BSP €103.85/MWh, Serbia’s SEEPEX €101.61/MWh, Montenegro’s BELEN €98.76/MWh, and Albania’s ALPEX €98.60/MWh. The spread between markets was not large enough to indicate a fully fractured market.

The price differences were still wide enough to show that national and corridor constraints were increasingly shaping value across the region. Romania was positioned at the top of the SEE price stack above Hungary, Bulgaria and Serbia in May data. Romania combines major generation resources with renewable potential, nuclear exposure and hydro flexibility, alongside cross-border links toward Hungary, Bulgaria, Serbia, Moldova and Ukraine. Network connection disputes and regulatory pressure around new grid access rules were also cited for the country.

Bulgaria, Greece and shifting balancing patterns

Bulgaria was described as moving quickly toward becoming a solar and battery storage hub, with storage growth tied to grid pressure. A system with excessive uncontrolled solar alongside insufficient transmission capacity can experience curtailment, negative-price risk and local congestion. Batteries can reduce parts of the problem but do not replace the need for stronger transmission corridors.

Greece was identified as a warning sign where strong solar growth coincides with visible curtailment pressure and low-price uncertainty for small investors . May flow data showed northern flows toward Greece deteriorating sharply . The flow pattern indicated continued dependence on imported balancing under certain conditions even when domestic solar could depress prices during other hours.

This contradiction was expected to become more common across Southeast Europe as countries may see renewable oversupply in one zone alongside scarcity in another. A solar-heavy area can produce negative prices at noon while expensive imports are still needed in the evening . The issue was framed around grid timing, flexibility and spatial coordination rather than renewable generation performance alone.

Serbia and Montenegro within an emerging congestion map

Serbia’s geographic position gives it strategic importance between Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Kosovo and North Macedonia . It can function as a regional balancing corridor if transmission investment, market coupling, grid-code enforcement and renewable connection planning keep pace with project development . If those elements do not align, Serbia risks acting as a congestion buffer rather than capturing value.

The same logic was applied to Montenegro, where hydropower and wind resources have regional value but export monetization depends increasingly on access to premium corridors . EPCG reported a €13 million Q1 export revenue impact from CBAM-related market effects . Adding physical congestion to that regulatory pressure increases the value gap for low-carbon generation.

Bosnia and Herzegovina supply reliability constraints

Bosnia and Herzegovina faces constraints linked to aging coal assets, delayed hydropower projects and fragmented institutional governance . Uncertainty around future supply reliability affects how projects progress from resource potential to bankable grid-connected capacity . Projects including HPP Dabar, HPP Mrsovo, Poklecani wind farm and Vlasic wind farm were cited as examples of that challenge.

Grid location becomes central for project bankability

For investors in Southeast Europe, due diligence priorities were described as changing beyond resource quality, EPC cost, permitting status and PPA price . Grid location is increasingly treated as a primary bankability variable with questions tied to substation selection, voltage level choice and congestion zone definition . Additional factors include neighboring market conditions, curtailment probability, balancing access, cross-border spreads and TSO reinforcement timelines.

A 100 MW solar project with strong irradiation but weak grid access may be less bankable than a smaller project near a strong transmission node with lower curtailment risk and better industrial offtake options . This was described as a shift in capital allocation toward projects designed around grid value rather than land availability alone . Developers holding cheap land in weak-grid zones may see reduced financing appetite compared with developers offering robust nodes, industrial consumers, storage integration and documented connection rights.

Lender requirements for transmission risk assessment

Banks were expected to respond by requiring more detailed technical work before committing long-term debt . Lenders were said to seek grid studies, TSO correspondence, curtailment scenarios and congestion sensitivity models along with power-flow analysis . Dispatch simulations plus independent technical review were also listed among expected requirements.

This approach was also described as increasing demand for Owner’s Engineer services and technical advisory roles because transmission risk cannot be fully captured through legal documentation alone . Integrated engineering together with market and financial analysis was presented as necessary for evaluating that risk . The direction of these changes was tied directly to how congestion affects captured prices.

Batteries tied to network stress rather than co-location only

The congestion decade was also described as reshaping battery storage economics in Southeast Europe . Storage value extends beyond shifting solar output from noon to evening by reducing congestion at specific nodes, supporting grid stability and participating in balancing markets . Best storage locations were therefore expected to be defined by network stress rather than only by proximity to generation clusters.

This creates an investment category described as congestion-relief batteries . A strategically placed battery near a constrained renewable cluster can generate revenue from arbitrage while supporting grid reliability . In more advanced market designs such assets may receive regulated or semi-regulated compensation for grid services.

Transmission congestion was also linked to industrial policy impacts for buyers exposed to CBAM . Renewable electricity needs delivery capability along with documentation and balancing arrangements because physical supply or hourly matching can fail under congestion constraints . A factory cannot rely on distant renewable assets if credible physical delivery cannot be maintained.

A CBAM-exposed manufacturer in Serbia or Montenegro would prefer renewable supply connected to credible network delivery paths including metering systems and balancing arrangements . Low-cost renewable generation stranded behind congestion would not address compliance needs under those conditions . Grid constraints were therefore described as potentially influencing industrial relocation decisions, export competitiveness outcomes and PPA bankability.

Transmission planning priorities across Southeast Europe

Governments across Southeast Europe face choices on whether transmission investment remains primarily a slow regulated utility function or becomes a strategic industrial policy priority . That decision affects whether renewable capacity translates into export competitiveness or remains stranded production . Future energy zones likely combine strong renewable resources with robust transmission access plus nearby industrial demand and storage potential . Areas lacking one or more of these elements may struggle to attract bankable capital.

Cross-border coordination was described as equally important because no single country can solve congestion alone given corridor-based electricity economics . Flows between Bulgaria and Greece, Serbia and Hungary, Romania and Hungary, Montenegro-linked markets toward Italy connections, plus Bosnia interactions with Serbia and Croatia were cited as interconnected drivers of congestion patterns . Reinforcing one national grid without aligning cross-border capacity could move congestion from one border area to another.

The May data set was presented as more than short-term market information because it shows early indications of a structural transition where transmission becomes the central scarce asset . Generation remains essential but grid access increasingly determines price capture along with financing quality and strategic value across markets . The winners of the next decade will not necessarily be countries with the most renewable megawatts; they will be those able to move electrons efficiently while documenting origin, balancing volatility and connecting power to higher-value consumers plus export corridors.

Elevated by Energy.Clarion.Engineer

Supported byClarion Owners Engineers
Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Serbia’s day-ahead power prices surge as Southeast European markets diverge

Day-ahead electricity prices in Serbia rose by €47.20/MWh to €150.18/MWh for October 1, as Hungary, Romania and northern Balkan markets recorded significant increases, while Albania and Montenegro moved lower. The divergence widened regional price spreads despite forecasts for higher renewable...

SEE electricity prices decline as renewable output increases and Italy’s premium widens

Electricity prices across southeastern Europe declined for September 30 delivery as forecasts pointed to stronger wind and solar generation and lower demand, reducing the region’s net import requirement. Italy largely bucked the trend, widening its price premium over neighbouring...

Southern Gas Corridor expansion delayed as EU buyers withhold long-term contracts

Expansion status and commercial conditions Expansion of the Southern Gas Corridor remains on hold as European buyers have not committed sufficient long-term offtake or financing. This limits the prospect of materially higher Caspian gas flows into Southeast Europe. SOCAR said...
Supported byVirtu Energy