Supported byClarion Energy
HomeElectricityBosnia and Herzegovina:...

Bosnia and Herzegovina: Republic of Srpska faces new €50 million arbitration over Ugljevik electricity dispute

After settling its debts to the company Viaduct, the Republic of Srpska (RS) is now facing another arbitration case in Washington, this time valued at over 50 million euros. The dispute has been initiated by the Slovenian company Elektrogospodarstvo against the RS, and by extension Bosnia and Herzegovina, over the failure to deliver electricity from the Ugljevik thermal power plant (TPP Ugljevik).

The joint investment agreement between Slovenia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, signed during the former Yugoslav period for the construction of two coal-fired units at Ugljevik, was neglected by Bosnian authorities for years. This oversight led to arbitration proceedings in both Belgrade and Washington, raising concerns that a repeat of past costly disputes could occur.

Opposition members in the RS National Assembly argue that such negligence has direct consequences for citizens, emphasizing that the financial burden of these disputes falls on taxpayers. They contend that funds spent on international litigation could have been used for pensions, salaries, child benefits, infrastructure, and education.

Management at the Ugljevik coalmine and thermal power plant rejects these criticisms, asserting that efforts are ongoing to resolve the case and that the outcome will not mirror the Viaduct situation. However, the potential financial liability remains unclear, as company officials emphasize that negotiations are confidential.

In 2016, the RS Government signed an agreement with the Council of Ministers of Bosnia and Herzegovina, committing to cover any damages should the case be lost. Nevertheless, there remains the possibility that RS authorities could refuse to honor these obligations, as has happened previously. Former state legal representatives warn that the case could again become a lengthy and costly process, imposing additional expenses on both the entity and the state.

The previous arbitration between Slovenia and Bosnia and Herzegovina resulted in a ruling against RS and BiH for approximately 125 million euros. In addition, Ugljevik was required to pay Slovenia another 65 million euros for undelivered electricity for the period from 2022 to 2024.

Supported byClarion Owners Engineers
Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Republika Srpska accelerates generation and gas projects after drought curbs output

Energy and Mining Minister Petar Djokic said electricity production in Republika Srpska can normally run about 35% above domestic demand. He added that the buffer narrowed during summer due to dry weather cutting hydropower output. The Ugljevik thermal power...

Bosnia-Croatia southern gas interconnection delayed over financing and land issues

Agreement talks with AAFS Infrastructure & Energy Plans for the Southern Gas Interconnection between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia remain delayed as developers work through financing, state-property and interstate-agreement issues. A planned agreement with US company AAFS Infrastructure & Energy,...

EU CBAM revisions could cut Bosnia electricity exporters’ costs by up to €13 million

Proposed changes to the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism could reduce the cost faced by Bosnia and Herzegovina’s electricity exporters by as much as €13 million annually. Bosnia says the revisions could save exporters €13 million a year,...
Supported byVirtu Energy