Several US infrastructure companies are actively exploring opportunities to participate in the construction of a gas pipeline that will connect Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Among these companies, Bechtel has emerged as a key player, recently sending representatives to Bosnia and Herzegovina to evaluate the commercial and regulatory landscape for potential involvement in the project.
Upon their arrival, Bechtel’s delegation met with US Chargé d’Affaires John Ginkel, who facilitated discussions with executives from AAFS Infrastructure and Energy. Both firms are engaging with political leaders and government officials in Bosnia and Herzegovina to navigate the framework necessary for advancing the Southern Gas Interconnection project.
The proposed pipeline is designed to link Bosnia and Herzegovina to Croatia’s gas network, following a route from Zagvozd through Posušje. This connection would provide access to the LNG terminal located on Croatia’s Krk Island, highlighting its significance in diversifying gas supply channels and enhancing regional energy security.
Bechtel stands out as the second-largest construction company in the United States, employing approximately 50,000 individuals and boasting extensive expertise in large-scale energy projects globally. In contrast, AAFS Infrastructure and Energy is a newer entity established in 2025, which has already garnered attention due to its perceived connections to former President Donald Trump’s administration.
Recent developments indicate renewed momentum for the Southern Gas Interconnection following initial actions by the Government of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina aimed at reviving the stalled project. Legislative progress had previously been hindered after relevant laws were passed by the entity’s parliament in January 2025.
The impasse arose when the HDZ BiH party resisted a project model that would place complete responsibility on Sarajevo-based BH Gas, which lacks representation from Croat officials. With US mediation now coming into play, discussions are underway regarding an alternative approach whereby a private US investor could take charge of project development and secure a long-term concession—potentially lasting at least 30 years—to operate the pipeline.
