Variable renewable generation in Southeast Europe declined in Week 22, falling 10.1% from 3.74 TWh to 3.36 TWh. The drop was driven by wind, with output down 30.0%, equivalent to 532 GWh. Solar generation moved higher, rising 7.8% or 153 GWh.
The change produced a more uneven production profile, with stronger daytime solar support alongside weaker wind contribution. This pattern increased exposure to evening scarcity conditions. As reported by Electricity.trade, regional power prices increasingly reflect not only renewable volumes but also the technology producing electricity and the timing of output.
Technology timing changes how renewables affect hourly prices
Solar generation is concentrated in daylight hours and can compress midday prices when demand is moderate and photovoltaic output peaks. Wind generation can be more valuable when it runs overnight, during the evening, or across broader scarcity periods. When wind output drops sharply, as occurred in Italy, Türkiye and Romania during Week 22, systems may rely more on gas, coal, hydro or imports to cover non-solar hours.
Italy sees weaker wind and higher thermal and gas generation
Italy provided the clearest example of the impact from falling wind. Wind generation fell heavily, contributing to a 32.6% increase in thermal output and a 25.3% increase in gas-fired generation. Italy’s weekly price rose to €123.58/MWh.
The price increase occurred alongside improved hydro generation and imports exceeding 1.1 TWh. Solar output alone was not sufficient to offset the commercial effect of weak wind during higher-value hours.
Bulgaria benefits from higher solar and stronger net exports
Bulgaria showed a different outcome as strong solar output helped reduce prices by 11.3%. Net exports increased from 6 GWh to 61 GWh. The shift supported system balance while also indicating potential capture-price pressure as solar penetration rises.
The source data indicate that more frequent midday price softening can reduce merchant revenues unless projects are structured with storage, flexible offtake or hedged contracts.
Implications for trading and project risk modelling
The wind-solar split increases complexity for market participants managing hourly positions rather than relying on weekly aggregates. For traders, the key operational questions include whether solar depresses noon prices, whether wind supports evening ramp periods, whether hydro can bridge gaps, and whether gas becomes marginal after sunset . Forecasting value rises as these hour-by-hour drivers become more important.
Powered by Electricity.Trade
Powered by Electricity.Trade
Powered by Electricity.Trade
Powered by Electricity.Trade
Powered by Electricity.Trade
Powered by Electricity.Trade
Powered by Electricity.Trade
Powered by Electricity.Trade
Powered by Electricity.Trade
Powered by Electricity.Trade
Powered by Electricity.Trade
Powered by Electricity.Trade
Powered by Electricity.Trade
Powered by Electricity.Trade
Powered by Electricity.Trade
Powered by Electricity.Trade
Powered by Electricity.Trade
Powered by Electricity.Trade
Powered by Electricity.Trade
Powered by Electricity.Trade
Powered by Electricity.Trade
For developers and lenders, Week 22 underscored the need to treat wind and solar separately in modelling because each technology carries different price risk, curtailment behaviour and system value. In SEE conditions described in the source data, wind may retain stronger value during non-solar hours while solar increasingly depends on storage and flexible commercial arrangements.
Regional market transition remains tied to evening scarcity exposure
The regional figures point to a market transition where solar growth continues while weak wind keeps evening prices exposed. The future value of renewables in Southeast Europe is described as depending less on headline megawatt-hours and more on hourly delivery patterns, grid location and the ability to match generation with scarcity conditions.








