Supported byClarion Energy
HomeNews Serbia EnergySerbia–Hungary oil pipeline...

Serbia–Hungary oil pipeline supervision tender partially cancelled by review authority

Partial cancellation of supervision tender

Serbia’s public-procurement review authority has partially cancelled the tender procedure covering professional construction supervision for the planned Serbia–Hungary oil pipeline. The decision does not change the selection process for the pipeline construction contractor. It requires Transnafta to repeat its assessment of bids submitted for the supervision contract.

The procurement was launched in December 2025. It was split into two lots: pipeline construction between the Hungarian border and Novi Sad, and professional supervision of the works.

Supervision contract value and bid outcomes

The combined estimated value of the procurement is €131 million excluding VAT. Approximately €5.1 million of that total is allocated to professional supervision. Transnafta selected a consortium led by SGS, together with Project Biro Utiber, SGS Czech Republic, Petrol Projekt and Preventiva 012.

The consortium’s offer was priced at €4.7 million including VAT. A competing consortium led by Bureau Veritas submitted a bid of €5.7 million including VAT and challenged the award.

Appeal findings on compliance documentation and personnel

Serbia’s Commission for the Protection of Rights in Public Procurement Procedures upheld the complaint and ordered a new evaluation. The appeal raised questions about whether SGS Czech Republic had adequately shown compliance with tax and social-security obligations. It also challenged evidence related to an account blockage requirement over the 36 months before the tender deadline.

Bureau Veritas argued that allowing bidders to supplement such documentation after submission would be inconsistent with procurement law. The complaint also questioned whether proposed engineering personnel met the tender’s qualification and experience requirements.

Implications for pre-construction timetable

The dispute involves a price gap between the two supervision bids, while supervision accounts for less than 4% of the overall procurement envelope. Transnafta is required to reassess bids before making a new award for the supervision contract. The adjustment extends the pre-construction timetable while leaving the main contractor lot formally unchanged.

Supported byClarion Owners Engineers
Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Hungary: HUPX September power prices surge 17.5% as day-ahead trading volume falls

Hungarian electricity exchange HUPX recorded a sharp increase in September day-ahead electricity prices, while traded volumes declined from August but remained above year-earlier levels. The rise in prices increased wholesale procurement costs as the market entered the final quarter...

Equinox Power plans 200 MW wind-solar-storage complex near Kula, Serbia

Project overview near Kula Serbian developer Equinox Power is planning an approximately 200 MW renewable energy complex near Kula, combining wind and solar generation with battery storage. The development would cover a planning area of nearly 1,758 hectares. The report...

Croatia and Hungary plan expanded oil and gas cooperation via JANAF and Krk LNG

Croatia and Hungary are exploring deeper cooperation in oil and gas infrastructure, with the JANAF pipeline and the Krk LNG terminal central to efforts to strengthen regional supply security. The discussions also cover practical steps aimed at demonstrating pipeline...
Supported byVirtu Energy