Supported byClarion Energy
HomeNews Serbia EnergySerbia–Hungary oil pipeline...

Serbia–Hungary oil pipeline supervision tender partially cancelled by review authority

Partial cancellation of supervision tender

Serbia’s public-procurement review authority has partially cancelled the tender procedure covering professional construction supervision for the planned Serbia–Hungary oil pipeline. The decision does not change the selection process for the pipeline construction contractor. It requires Transnafta to repeat its assessment of bids submitted for the supervision contract.

The procurement was launched in December 2025. It was split into two lots: pipeline construction between the Hungarian border and Novi Sad, and professional supervision of the works.

Supervision contract value and bid outcomes

The combined estimated value of the procurement is €131 million excluding VAT. Approximately €5.1 million of that total is allocated to professional supervision. Transnafta selected a consortium led by SGS, together with Project Biro Utiber, SGS Czech Republic, Petrol Projekt and Preventiva 012.

The consortium’s offer was priced at €4.7 million including VAT. A competing consortium led by Bureau Veritas submitted a bid of €5.7 million including VAT and challenged the award.

Appeal findings on compliance documentation and personnel

Serbia’s Commission for the Protection of Rights in Public Procurement Procedures upheld the complaint and ordered a new evaluation. The appeal raised questions about whether SGS Czech Republic had adequately shown compliance with tax and social-security obligations. It also challenged evidence related to an account blockage requirement over the 36 months before the tender deadline.

Bureau Veritas argued that allowing bidders to supplement such documentation after submission would be inconsistent with procurement law. The complaint also questioned whether proposed engineering personnel met the tender’s qualification and experience requirements.

Implications for pre-construction timetable

The dispute involves a price gap between the two supervision bids, while supervision accounts for less than 4% of the overall procurement envelope. Transnafta is required to reassess bids before making a new award for the supervision contract. The adjustment extends the pre-construction timetable while leaving the main contractor lot formally unchanged.

Supported byClarion Owners Engineers
Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

EPS secures €107.5 million for hydro upgrades and coal-site solar in Serbia

EPS, Serbia’s state utility, has secured approximately €107.5 million to modernise hydropower plants and develop more than 120 MW of solar capacity on land tied to former coal-fired facilities. The financing package combines a €100 million European Investment Bank...

E.ON Hungaria commissions 4 MW/12 MWh batteries for Hungarian solar balancing

Battery rollout on E.ON Hungaria’s distribution network E.ON Hungaria has commissioned four battery facilities on its distribution network, adding 4 MW of power and 12 MWh of storage capacity. The projects are intended to manage expanding solar generation and short-term...

Oil prices rise as Serbia prepares for winter energy demand

Serbia’s winter preparations are being shaped by oil, gas and weak hydrology, with the winter energy balance becoming more exposed to international fuel prices and electricity imports. Expensive oil and gas coincide with exceptionally weak hydropower production, increasing reliance...
Supported byVirtu Energy