Financing wind in Montenegro,...

The landscape of renewable finance in Southeast Europe has undergone a profound transformation....

How Southeast Europe’s grid...

Wind development in Southeast Europe is accelerating at a pace unimaginable only a...

Serbia–Romania–Croatia: The new triangular...

For years, the Iberian Peninsula defined what a wind powerhouse looked like inside...

The bankability gap in...

The transformation of Southeast Europe into a credible wind-investment region has been rapid,...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsMontenegro: Key projects...

Montenegro: Key projects at Pljevlja thermal power plant

Montenegro’s Minister of Energy, Saša Mujović, visited the Pljevlja Thermal Power Plant, emphasizing its significance as a vital asset for the country’s energy sector. During his visit, he reviewed progress on the ecological reconstruction project, which is crucial for the power system of Montenegro.

Mujović highlighted the importance of simultaneously relocating the Ćehotina River and implementing the ecological reconstruction. He stated, “We aim to have the Pljevlja Thermal Power Plant operational by November 2025.” He stressed that delays in the reconstruction could jeopardize coal supplies, affecting electricity production.

Praising the management of both the Coal Mine and the Thermal Power Plant, Mujović noted their responsible handling of the projects. He warned that any hesitance in legal solutions could be costly for Montenegro, given the volatile nature of electricity prices.

The minister assured that the ecological reconstruction would comply with European standards, aiming to reduce sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter, and noise levels. He also mentioned plans to improve heating in Pljevlja by phasing out coal as the primary energy source for heating, which he believes will enhance ecological, health, and economic conditions in the city.

The estimated cost for the ecological reconstruction project ranges from 70 to 80 million euros, while relocating the Ćehotina River is projected to cost around 20 million euros. Mujović acknowledged the challenges posed by fluctuating labor and material prices, as well as potential delays in electricity production.

He concluded by stating that despite the hurdles, it is essential to invest in the energy sector for the well-being of citizens, asserting, “The health of our citizens has no price, and investments will yield returns.”

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Financing wind in Montenegro, Serbia, Croatia and Romania — why international lenders are returning to Southeast Europe

The landscape of renewable finance in Southeast Europe has undergone a profound transformation. A decade ago, lenders viewed the region with a degree of caution, shaped by fluctuating regulatory frameworks, limited track records, and the perceived fragility of local...

How Southeast Europe’s grid bottlenecks will reshape project valuation, offtake strategy and EPC designs by 2030

Wind development in Southeast Europe is accelerating at a pace unimaginable only a decade ago, yet the region’s grid infrastructure is straining under the weight of its own renewable ambition. Serbia is preparing for multi-gigawatt expansion, Romania is restarting...

Serbia–Romania–Croatia: The new triangular wind corridor — is Southeast Europe becoming Europe’s next Iberia?

For years, the Iberian Peninsula defined what a wind powerhouse looked like inside Europe: strong resource, open land, grid-ready corridors, competitive auctions, and the steady inflow of international capital. Investors seeking scale, yield, and policy clarity migrated naturally towards...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!