Supported byClarion Energy
HomeHydroMontenegro: HPP Komarnica...

Montenegro: HPP Komarnica should not be built if it endangers the environment

The UNESCO World Heritage Committee has warned Montenegro that it must ensure that the possible impact of the Komarnica HPP construction on general universal values and the environment is evaluated during the upcoming evaluation by the European Environment Agency (EIA).

It was also stated that particular attention must be paid to the state of the environment after the construction of the priority section of the Smokovac-Mateševo highway, especially the protection of key species that were endangered during the works. The committee obliged Montenegro to evaluate the comprehensive possible impact that the proposed construction of the lead and zinc mine in Mojkovac would have on the environment.

Supported by

All this is stated in the draft report prepared by the Committee on Montenegro at the session in Riyadh, which is held from September 10th to 25th this year.

The deadline by which Montenegro must inform the Committee about all actions taken expires on December 1st, 2024. Until then, Montenegro is obliged to submit a comprehensive report on all steps.

Regarding HPP Komarnica, it is especially important to consider the further implications that the expansion of the project would have on Dragišnica and the Komarnica Nature Park, and it is recommended not to approve the project if it could have negative consequences on general universal values and the environment.

BiH and Serbia call for the construction of the hydroelectric power plant on the Drina to be accompanied by a comprehensive assessment of the impact on the environment, and that the strategic assessment of the impact on the environment must be carried out in cooperation with Montenegro.

In particular, such an invitation is sent to BiH for the Buk-Bijela project, where a comprehensive environmental impact assessment is requested.

For all these projects, the Committee recommends Montenegro, Serbia and BiH to undertake all actions in coordination with that Committee, in order to avoid making some decisions whose consequences would later be difficult or impossible to remove.

Montenegro was also recommended to apply strict environmental protection standards when it comes to the Lastva Grbaljska – Pljevlja transmission line project.

Supported byClarion Owners Engineers
Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Perućica hydropower unit EPCG returns 190 MW after annual maintenance

Montenegro’s state power utility EPCG has returned 190 MW of capacity at the Perućica hydropower plant to operation after completing the main phase of its annual maintenance programme. The restoration brings additional generation capacity back online following the maintenance...

Montenegro’s renewable boom reaches the grid-connection test

Montenegro has accumulated a large pipeline of proposed solar and wind projects, but August reinforced that the decisive development constraint is shifting toward the transmission system. CGES and Nu Energy signed the grid-connection agreement for the Velestovo project, one of the country’s more advanced...

EPCG progresses Gvozd 2 wind expansion with second turbine foundation in Montenegro

Montenegro’s state power utility EPCG has completed work on the second of three turbine foundations at the 21 MW Gvozd 2 wind farm. The milestone advances a nearly €26 million expansion intended to reduce exposure to hydrological volatility and...
Supported byVirtu Energy