Supported byClarion Energy
HomeElectricitySerbia: TPP Kolubara...

Serbia: TPP Kolubara B spatial plan public debate stopped

According to the statement from the Ministry of Construction and Infrastructure, it has decided to end the discussion on the project soon after it started due to the obstruction of non-governmental organization Renewables and Environmental Regulatory Institute (RERI).

According to RERI, the Ministry tried to hold the public debate despite organizational shortcomings, such as the ban on gatherings of more than 30 people due to the coronavirus pandemic. Thus, many were left out of the building where the debate was held, unable to participate in the discussion. In July, public debate on the draft spatial plan for the project for the construction of TPP Kolubara B was postponed to an undisclosed date due to a spread of COVID-19 in the country. In March, state-owned power utility EPS signed a preliminary agreement on cooperation with Chinese company PowerChina on the construction of coal-fired thermal power plant Kolubara B. The preliminary agreement was signed by Acting Director of EPS Milorad Grcic and Director of PowerChina Yang Bo. The construction of this energy facility was originally planned in 1990s and now EPS plans to complete the 350 MW project in cooperation with Chinese company. The construction of a new unit will ensure Serbia’s sustainable industrial development and will be built in line with the latest EU environmental standards. The new unit represents replacement capacity for ageing TPP Morava and TPP Kolubara A. The construction of TPP Kolubara B, located in the town of Veliki Crljeni, started in the early 1990s, but shortly after was abandoned due to the break-up of Yugoslavia. In June 2011, EPS signed a preliminary agreement with Italian Edison to set up a joint venture for the construction of the plant and in 2012 the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) expressed interest in financing the project. However, in September 2013, the EBRD said it is no longer interested in financing the plant, due to its policy for limiting lending for coal-fired power plants construction projects and in 2014 the project was again abandoned.

 

 

 

 

Supported byClarion Owners Engineers
Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Djerdap 3 pumped-storage: Bechtel-Enka qualifies as Serbia prepares planning

Serbia has advanced work on the proposed Djerdap 3 pumped-storage hydropower project, with a Bechtel-Enka consortium qualifying for the next stage of government negotiations. At the same time, a Serbian engineering consortium is preparing the project’s planning framework. The...

Domestic industrial PPAs open new revenue opportunities for Serbian and Montenegrin renewables

Domestic industrial demand can support renewable investment and improve electricity cost predictability, but the carbon value of a power purchase agreement depends on the products being exported and the emissions rules governing them. Renewable developers in Serbia and Montenegro have...

Serbian renewable projects face new contractual challenges on the Hungary export corridor

Export PPAs can expand market access for wind and solar projects, but the revenue ultimately reaching developers depends on delivery rights, trading costs and the share of output that qualifies for actual-emissions treatment. Serbian wind and solar developers targeting Hungarian...
Supported byVirtu Energy