Supported byClarion Energy
HomeElectricityRomania: State’s interference...

Romania: State’s interference in the management of Hidroelectrica

Private investment fund Fondul Proprietatea (FP) is a minority stakeholder in electricity producer Hidroelectrica. FP reacted to recent comments of the Minister of Economy and Energy, according to which Hidroelectrica could supply energy directly to the population for a much lower price. According to FP, the statement is a violation of GEO 109/ 2011 on corporate governance in state-owned enterprises, as the law prohibits direct involvement of the state as a shareholder in the management of the company.

Concerned on the violation of corporate governance law in Hidroelectrica, FP Portfolio Manager Johan Meyer said that it is unacceptable to see the same practices that, years ago, have led Hidroelectrica into insolvency. The Government should only observe and assure the legal framework in which business operations securely take place, without interfering with management decisions. Romania has a history with politicians influencing day to day business decisions of state-owned companies with serious negative consequences for their financial results.

In the past, lack of corporate governance code implementation led to negative outcomes for many state-owned companies. Such an example is the case of Hidroelectrica when the company entered into detrimental long-term energy contracts or when it was forced to buy electricity from other producers which were more expensive. These poor decisions along with many others led to Hidroelectrica’s insolvency in 2012 and it took five years for the company to overcome the negative consequences. Other more recent well-known examples are Romgaz when it was decided for the company to offer discounts to certain clients or the case of EC Oltenia which continued to supply lignite to clients that were not able or willing to observe their commercial obligations.

Hidroelectrica is a highly valuable company and a unique asset not only in Romania, but also in in Europe, with significant profitability margins and a sustainable business model that is focused on clean energy production. Hence, FP recommends the Romanian Government as majority shareholder to focus on creating the grounds for the most strategic business objective for Hidroelectrica: a successful listing in the first semester of the next year, as it is planned. Hidroelectrica’s listing would be a hugely important landmark for the local capital market and the entire economy, especially in the current context.

 

 

 

Supported byClarion Owners Engineers
Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

TDI financing for 58 MW Iratoșu solar plant in western Romania

TDI Renewables has secured €25.5 million in financing from Raiffeisen Bank International for its 58 MW Iratoșu solar power plant in western Romania. The project is located in Arad county and is part of a broader development programme that...

Nuclearelectrica revises 2026 outlook as Cernavoda outages drive replacement power costs

Romanian nuclear producer Nuclearelectrica has reduced its forecast for 2026 net profit by 42.9% to €221 million. The company attributed the change to prolonged outages at Cernavoda, which have lowered electricity sales and required purchases of replacement power. Revised...

Romania extends 25% diesel excise reduction until Oct. 31

Romania will keep a 25% reduction in diesel excise duty until Oct. 31, extending temporary relief for transport operators and other businesses. The decision follows a period in which international fuel-market prices have risen faster than domestic pump prices....
Supported byVirtu Energy