Supported byClarion Energy
HomeGasSerbia seeks short-term...

Serbia seeks short-term extension of Gazprom gas deal amid EU policy uncertainty

Serbia’s long-term natural gas strategy has entered a period of uncertainty, prompting Belgrade to prioritize extending its current supply arrangement with Russia’s Gazprom rather than securing a new multi-year agreement. According to Srbijagas Director Dušan Bajatović, the EU’s plan to gradually phase out imports of Russian pipeline gas and LNG has fundamentally reshaped the negotiating landscape. As a result, Serbia now expects its existing contract to be prolonged only through the current heating season — and possibly for no more than a year. Bajatović added that once the temporary extension expires, negotiating conditions may become more favorable for discussing a longer-term deal.

To mitigate potential supply risks, Srbijagas has already prepared several contingency scenarios. These include relying on substantial reserve volumes, sufficient to cover national consumption for around 70 days, and turning to spot-market purchases if necessary. Although Belgrade is treating all possibilities seriously, Bajatović said Russian officials continue to insist that interrupting deliveries to Serbia would be inconceivable.

Serbia’s present supply arrangement is based on a three-year contract signed in 2022 for up to 2.2 billion cubic meters of gas annually. Although the agreement formally expired in May, it has been extended multiple times — first through late September, then into October, and most recently until the end of December. Belgrade had initially hoped to negotiate a new three-year contract for 2.5 billion cubic meters per year, but developments in EU policy have complicated those efforts.

In October, the Council of the EU endorsed a proposal to introduce a phased ban on imports of Russian pipeline gas and LNG beginning in January 2026. According to the proposal, existing short-term supply contracts may continue until mid-June 2026, while longer-term arrangements can stay in force until early 2028. The announcement triggered concerns in Serbia, where officials emphasized that the country relies heavily on Russian gas delivered through the TurkStream extension via Bulgaria. EU Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos later clarified that the regulation would not restrict the transit of Russian gas to Serbia.

President Aleksandar Vučić has suggested that Gazprom may prefer short-term extensions rather than concluding a new multi-year agreement, potentially to preserve negotiating leverage amid ongoing uncertainty surrounding NIS — the Serbian oil company indirectly controlled by Gazprom that is currently subject to U.S. sanctions. Bajatović, however, downplayed any direct connection, saying he does not see an immediate link between the two issues.

Serbia expects to consume around 2.7 billion cubic meters of natural gas this year. In addition to Russian volumes, the country supplements its supply with approximately 400 million cubic meters of Azeri gas imported through the Bulgaria–Serbia interconnector.

Supported byClarion Owners Engineers
Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Serbia and SOCAR near joint venture for up to 500 MW gas-fired CHP

Serbia is close to setting up a joint venture with Azerbaijan’s SOCAR to develop a gas-fired combined heat and power plant. The planned facility would have capacity of up to 500 MW. The project is being advanced through negotiations...

Serbia’s power system recovery meets continued lignite dependence and rising project costs

Generation mix after earlier operational issues A 2025 energy-sector assessment says Serbia’s electricity system has recovered from severe operational problems earlier in the decade, but the sector remains exposed to further shocks. Continued reliance on lignite, higher infrastructure costs and...

Serbia maintains power price advantage as volatility challenges export potential

Serbia maintained one of the more competitive wholesale electricity positions in Southeast Europe during the second half of August, supported by stronger hydro, renewable and thermal generation. However, the sharp increase in prices at the beginning of September demonstrated...
Supported byVirtu Energy