Supported byClarion Energy
HomeNews Serbia EnergySerbia initiates construction...

Serbia initiates construction of new crude oil pipeline to enhance energy supply security

Serbia has officially launched a public tender for the construction of a new crude oil pipeline that will connect the Hungarian border with Novi Sad. This initiative, announced by Transnafta, aims to bolster supply security by introducing an alternative import route. The tender encompasses both construction work and expert supervision to ensure the project’s successful execution.

The proposed pipeline will stretch approximately 113 kilometers, traversing regions from Kanjiza through Senta, Ada, Becej, and Zabalj to Novi Sad. It is expected to have an annual capacity of 5.5 million tons and is primarily intended for transporting Russian Export Blend (REB) crude oil. However, due to EU sanctions imposed in late 2022, Serbia has faced challenges in importing Russian oil. The Ministry of Energy has underscored that the project’s significance lies in diversifying energy sources rather than relying on a single supplier. Currently, Serbia’s crude imports predominantly depend on the JANAF pipeline, contingent upon US sanctions not hindering operations. Authorities have completed feasibility studies and spatial planning, with location permits underway; construction is anticipated to commence by mid-year.

In addition to enhancing domestic supply routes, the Ministry highlighted broader regional energy strategies. Hungary and Slovakia currently receive supplies via the southern branch of the Druzhba pipeline. Future connections between Druzhba and the planned Sarmatia pipeline near Brody in Ukraine could facilitate the flow of Caspian oil into Central and Southeastern Europe, further expanding Serbia’s options. While JANAF is likely to remain the primary supply channel in the short term, officials assert that additional routes will strengthen negotiating leverage and mitigate risks associated with dependence on singular sources. Serbia is also considering developing product pipelines with Hungary and Romania to enable transportation of petroleum products without relying on river, rail, or road logistics. A preliminary strategic assessment has been conducted with Transnafta regarding these potential projects.

Industry experts indicate that this new pipeline could also transport non-Russian crude if integrated into suitable points along Druzhba. For instance, Kazakh oil deliveries to Germany’s Schwedt refinery via the northern Druzhba branch reached approximately 1.4 million tons in 2024 and are projected at around 2 million tons by 2025. Economically speaking, transit through JANAF can incur costs up to €48 million annually; however, operating a domestic pipeline is estimated at about €10 million per year. If initiated promptly, this project could be completed within a 20-month timeframe, presenting both financial viability and strategic advantages for Serbia’s energy landscape.

Supported byClarion Owners Engineers
Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

EPS opens renewable M&A channel for Serbian wind, solar and hybrid projects

Serbia’s state-owned power utility EPS has opened a formal channel to acquire or partner with privately developed renewable energy projects of at least 50 MW, creating a potential exit opportunity for developers as grid access, financing and market conditions...

Serbia and SOCAR near joint venture for up to 500 MW gas-fired CHP

Serbia is close to setting up a joint venture with Azerbaijan’s SOCAR to develop a gas-fired combined heat and power plant. The planned facility would have capacity of up to 500 MW. The project is being advanced through negotiations...

Serbia’s power system recovery meets continued lignite dependence and rising project costs

Generation mix after earlier operational issues A 2025 energy-sector assessment says Serbia’s electricity system has recovered from severe operational problems earlier in the decade, but the sector remains exposed to further shocks. Continued reliance on lignite, higher infrastructure costs and...
Supported byVirtu Energy