Supported byClarion Energy
HomeNews Serbia EnergySerbia: Could nuclear...

Serbia: Could nuclear energy be an alternative to coal

While energy experts advocate for nuclear energy as a viable replacement for coal in future electricity production, environmentalists express strong opposition, citing concerns over its potential hazards to human health and the environment. They highlight the legal prohibition on the construction of nuclear power plants in Serbia as a significant deterrent.

Minister of Mining and Energy, Dubravka Đedović Handanović, acknowledges nuclear energy as a base source and emphasizes the need to secure its utilization by 2040, alongside renewable energy sources. She underscores advancements in smaller and more cost-effective nuclear reactor technologies, signalling a shift away from coal reliance.

Nikola Rajaković, a professor at the Faculty of Electrical Engineering in Belgrade, stresses the importance of considering nuclear energy as a potential solution to replace coal-fired power generation in the next two decades. While acknowledging safety concerns, Rajaković suggests conducting feasibility studies to explore the viability of nuclear energy alongside renewable sources.

Vojislav Vuletić, General Secretary of the Serbian Gas Association, echoes support for nuclear energy as a realistic alternative to coal, given Serbia’s limited renewable resources. He emphasizes the need to address staffing shortages and regulatory barriers to nuclear development while highlighting the continued relevance of gas as an energy source.

Svetlana Stanišić, a professor at Singidunum University, outlines the global energy challenge and underscores the benefits of nuclear energy, citing France’s successful utilization of nuclear reactors. Stanišić emphasizes nuclear energy’s lower environmental impact compared to fossil fuels and its potential role in combating climate change.

However, Aleksandar Jovanović Ćuta from the Ecological Uprising rebukes Minister Handanović’s advocacy for nuclear energy, citing legal prohibitions and urging prioritization of environmental concerns over speculative projects. He stresses the importance of addressing communal and environmental issues rather than pursuing contentious initiatives.

The debate underscores the complexities surrounding Serbia’s energy transition, balancing the imperative to reduce reliance on coal with environmental and legal considerations. As Serbia navigates its energy future, a comprehensive approach encompassing renewable sources, nuclear energy, and environmental stewardship will be essential to ensure sustainable development.

Supported byClarion Owners Engineers
Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Gazprom gas extension talks in Serbia as NIS sanctions deadline nears

Serbia expects to extend its gas supply arrangement with Gazprom beyond September 30 while Russian deliveries continue. President Aleksandar Vučić said after a call with Russian President Vladimir Putin that an annex should be signed shortly. The extension’s duration,...

Serbia targets early-2027 start for Romanian gas interconnector construction

Serbia expects construction of its gas interconnector with Romania to begin in early 2027, creating an import route intended to diversify supply and strengthen network resilience. Procurement for the Serbian section is expected to start shortly. Most technical and...

Azerbaijan to raise gas deliveries for Niš 350 MW power and 150 MW heat project

Azerbaijan plans to increase gas deliveries to Serbia as the two countries advance a proposed 350 MW power plant and 150 MW heat plant in Niš. Azerbaijani officials said higher volumes would accompany development of the project. The Niš...
Supported byVirtu Energy