Supported byClarion Energy
HomeElectricitySerbia: Could EPS...

Serbia: Could EPS expand in the region?

Serbia’s President, Aleksandar Vučić, made it clear that the sale of EPS (Electric Power Industry of Serbia) is not on the agenda. Instead, he announced plans for Serbia to acquire other power companies in the region, signaling a shift towards regional energy consolidation. However, skepticism looms within the professional sphere regarding the feasibility of such an endeavor, particularly considering EPS’s financial challenges, which are estimated to have cost the country over one billion euros.

Vučić reiterated this stance during a pre-election meeting of the coalition surrounding the Serbian Progressive Party in Lazarevac, dismissing speculations about EPS’s privatization. His remarks indirectly suggest that Serbia aims to leverage its energy prowess to extend influence across the region.

However, energy experts like Velimir Gavrilović express doubts about Serbia’s ability to ensure EPS’s stability, let alone expand its capacities by integrating neighboring countries’ energy systems. Gavrilović argues that such expansion is only viable if EPS transitions from losses to capital accumulation.

Given EPS’s recent struggles, which included personnel issues and financial losses amid rising market prices and electricity imports, doubts persist about its financial capacity for expansion. Gavrilović emphasizes the need for substantial funding, possibly through state-backed borrowing, for planned projects like the construction of one gigawatt of solar power plants.

He suggests that expansion efforts should primarily target Montenegro and Republika Srpska, considering their existing connections with Serbia. However, Miodrag Kapor views this announcement as politically motivated, potentially serving geopolitical interests rather than economic rationale.

Nenad Jovanović echoes the sentiment, asserting that EPS lacks the financial means for expansion. While theoretically possible, practical obstacles hinder such ambitions. Željko Marković concurs, suggesting that due to financial constraints, any expansion would likely involve acquiring parts of smaller regional power companies.

Recent challenges, including a major incident at the end of 2021 that led to widespread power outages and infrastructure damage, highlight EPS’s vulnerabilities. Despite criminal charges against EPS leadership, accountability remains elusive.

In summary, while the idea of Serbia acquiring regional power companies is politically appealing, financial constraints and EPS’s operational challenges cast doubts on its feasibility. Any expansion efforts would require substantial funding and address internal issues within EPS to ensure stability and success.

Supported byClarion Owners Engineers
Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Serbia and SOCAR near joint venture for up to 500 MW gas-fired CHP

Serbia is close to setting up a joint venture with Azerbaijan’s SOCAR to develop a gas-fired combined heat and power plant. The planned facility would have capacity of up to 500 MW. The project is being advanced through negotiations...

Serbia’s power system recovery meets continued lignite dependence and rising project costs

Generation mix after earlier operational issues A 2025 energy-sector assessment says Serbia’s electricity system has recovered from severe operational problems earlier in the decade, but the sector remains exposed to further shocks. Continued reliance on lignite, higher infrastructure costs and...

Serbia maintains power price advantage as volatility challenges export potential

Serbia maintained one of the more competitive wholesale electricity positions in Southeast Europe during the second half of August, supported by stronger hydro, renewable and thermal generation. However, the sharp increase in prices at the beginning of September demonstrated...
Supported byVirtu Energy