Supported byClarion Energy
HomeElectricitySerbia: Could EPS...

Serbia: Could EPS expand in the region?

Serbia’s President, Aleksandar Vučić, made it clear that the sale of EPS (Electric Power Industry of Serbia) is not on the agenda. Instead, he announced plans for Serbia to acquire other power companies in the region, signaling a shift towards regional energy consolidation. However, skepticism looms within the professional sphere regarding the feasibility of such an endeavor, particularly considering EPS’s financial challenges, which are estimated to have cost the country over one billion euros.

Vučić reiterated this stance during a pre-election meeting of the coalition surrounding the Serbian Progressive Party in Lazarevac, dismissing speculations about EPS’s privatization. His remarks indirectly suggest that Serbia aims to leverage its energy prowess to extend influence across the region.

However, energy experts like Velimir Gavrilović express doubts about Serbia’s ability to ensure EPS’s stability, let alone expand its capacities by integrating neighboring countries’ energy systems. Gavrilović argues that such expansion is only viable if EPS transitions from losses to capital accumulation.

Given EPS’s recent struggles, which included personnel issues and financial losses amid rising market prices and electricity imports, doubts persist about its financial capacity for expansion. Gavrilović emphasizes the need for substantial funding, possibly through state-backed borrowing, for planned projects like the construction of one gigawatt of solar power plants.

He suggests that expansion efforts should primarily target Montenegro and Republika Srpska, considering their existing connections with Serbia. However, Miodrag Kapor views this announcement as politically motivated, potentially serving geopolitical interests rather than economic rationale.

Nenad Jovanović echoes the sentiment, asserting that EPS lacks the financial means for expansion. While theoretically possible, practical obstacles hinder such ambitions. Željko Marković concurs, suggesting that due to financial constraints, any expansion would likely involve acquiring parts of smaller regional power companies.

Recent challenges, including a major incident at the end of 2021 that led to widespread power outages and infrastructure damage, highlight EPS’s vulnerabilities. Despite criminal charges against EPS leadership, accountability remains elusive.

In summary, while the idea of Serbia acquiring regional power companies is politically appealing, financial constraints and EPS’s operational challenges cast doubts on its feasibility. Any expansion efforts would require substantial funding and address internal issues within EPS to ensure stability and success.

Supported byClarion Owners Engineers
Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Djerdap 3 pumped-storage: Bechtel-Enka qualifies as Serbia prepares planning

Serbia has advanced work on the proposed Djerdap 3 pumped-storage hydropower project, with a Bechtel-Enka consortium qualifying for the next stage of government negotiations. At the same time, a Serbian engineering consortium is preparing the project’s planning framework. The...

Domestic industrial PPAs open new revenue opportunities for Serbian and Montenegrin renewables

Domestic industrial demand can support renewable investment and improve electricity cost predictability, but the carbon value of a power purchase agreement depends on the products being exported and the emissions rules governing them. Renewable developers in Serbia and Montenegro have...

Serbian renewable projects face new contractual challenges on the Hungary export corridor

Export PPAs can expand market access for wind and solar projects, but the revenue ultimately reaching developers depends on delivery rights, trading costs and the share of output that qualifies for actual-emissions treatment. Serbian wind and solar developers targeting Hungarian...
Supported byVirtu Energy