Supported byClarion Energy
HomeHydroMontenegro: WWF Adria...

Montenegro: WWF Adria report – SHPPs are not sustainable without state subsidies

The sustainability of small hydropower plants(SHPP) falls to an unacceptably low level when projections are cleared of state subsidies, namely when balances are simulated so that they are based on market prices, according to a report of WWF Adria.

Thanks to the established system of incentives for the production of electricity from renewable sources, the average cost-effectiveness of the 11 SHPPs that were analyzed is extremely high. According to the analysis, it amounts to 15.5 % and is far higher than the so-called required rate of return, which is the minimum rate at which entrepreneurs are willing to invest in the business of that level of risk, which in the case of energy is about 8 %.

In addition, if SHPP projects are analyzed only from the perspective of their operators, then the rate of return of all projects averages almost a staggering 53.5 %. This further increase in the rate of return is a result of the fact that these projects are predominantly loan-financed.

SHPP projects, which have no financial sustainability without the state help, must have some non-monetary positive external benefits, such as environmental benefits. However, the present value of environmental benefits from carbon dioxide emissions has been found to be equivalent to an annual value ranging from 192,000 to 249,000 euros per year. These benefits form the basis for justifying subsidies for electricity generation in SHPP. But, these benefits are more than four times less than the subsidies that should just offset the non-monetary benefits.

Last May, Minister of Economy Dragica Sekulic said that the Government tasked the Ministry to review all documentation issued by Montenegrin institutions related to the concessions awarded for the construction of small hydropower plants, adding that no new SHPPs will be built. She said that the amount of funds needed to cover the incentives for electricity production from renewable sources will no longer be paid by household consumers, thus decreasing their electricity bills by 1.5 to 5 %. These funds will now be collected from the largest polluters. However, in July, the Government awarded concessions for the construction of two new small hydropower plants – SHPP Stitska on the Stitska Rijeka and SHPP Umska on the Umski Potok.

Supported byClarion Owners Engineers
Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

MMK Vilusi requests environmental screening for 35 MW solar plant in Nikšić

MMK Vilusi has applied for environmental screening for a 35 MW solar power project in western Montenegro, with the development planned for the Nikšić municipality. The request is described as an early regulatory step in the project’s permitting process....

Domestic industrial PPAs open new revenue opportunities for Serbian and Montenegrin renewables

Domestic industrial demand can support renewable investment and improve electricity cost predictability, but the carbon value of a power purchase agreement depends on the products being exported and the emissions rules governing them. Renewable developers in Serbia and Montenegro have...

Montenegro’s electricity exporters need stronger PPAs to secure Italian market revenues

The Adriatic interconnector gives Montenegro's renewable generators access to Italian buyers, but investment returns depend on carbon treatment, delivery profiles and the fallback provisions built into individual export agreements. Montenegro's electricity interconnection with Italy offers renewable energy investors access to...
Supported byVirtu Energy