Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsMontenegro: Green NGOs...

Montenegro: Green NGOs warn on enviromment impact of new TPP Pljevlja unit

Montenegro and other Balkan countries invest “significant investment” in building environmentally harmful thermal power plants because they want to sell cheaper electricity to the European Union, at a time when the Union is looking for new electricity suppliers in order to reduce its dependence on Russian gas.

EU officials are apparently reluctant to use the energy negotiations and laws in the area of ​​trade in order to force these countries to apply standards aimed at reducing air pollution, despite the risks that rush could have on climate change and the EU’s enlargement policy, as well as finance and people health in the Balkans.

Montenegro, Serbia, Bosnia, Macedonia, Kosovo and Ukraine plan to build power plants with total capacity of 14.82 GW, many of which will be in addition to existing capacity, according to a study of Partnership change, ordered by the NGO CEE Bankwatch.

These countries are members of the Energy Community, which is mainly funded by EU to contribute to the integration of these markets with the EU after the Balkan wars. Reforms of the Community agreement will be proposed at a meeting in June in Vienna, in order to be adopted by October.

However, fighters for environment protection claim that the European Commission has a little appetite to take advantage of these negotiations to increase the standards relating to the environment and air pollution.

“The Commission should consider the possible actions of the EU. It would, however, continue to require some analysis to find out how such measures ‘interfere’ with the objectives of our policy and international obligations”, said a Commission source.

The Energy Community Treaty “in principle” does not allow restrictions on imports, the source said, but membership “means” that states must abide by the same rules for the environment protection.

The new thermal power plants in Serbia, Montenegro and Ukraine are not sufficiently advanced to reduce emissions of toxic air contaminants such as sulfur dioxide, warns NGO Center for European Reform (CER).

The application of technologies that aim to reduce the sulfur dioxide emissions is legally binding in the EU.

Montenegro, Serbia and Ukraine “substantially” increase the coal use, CER warns.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), deaths as a consequence of air pollution cost Montenegro 14.5 percent of its GDP, while in Serbia the percentage is higher – 33.5 and 26.5 in Ukraine.

Supported byClarion Owners Engineers
Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Serbia, Montenegro power prices climb as Hungary-Germany spread narrows

Electricity prices in Serbia and Montenegro rose sharply for Tuesday delivery, moving against declines in Hungary and Romania as southeastern Europe’s reliance on imports increased despite stronger solar generation. The divergence highlights tighter local supply conditions in parts of...

Slovenia restarts Sostanj unit 5 to meet district heating demand

Slovenia’s Sostanj thermal power plant has temporarily restarted unit 5 as colder weather increases district heating demand. Unit 6 remains under maintenance while unit 5 is brought back into service. Heat demand has reached approximately 400 MWh a day. Unit...

E.ON Hungaria €625 million grid programme targets 2,323 MW connection capacity

E.ON is planning a €625 million expansion of its Hungarian grid. Separately, E.ON Hungaria is outlining a €625 million network investment programme aimed at adding 2,323 MW of connection capacity by 2030. The plan is intended to support additional...
Supported byVirtu Energy