Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsEU Commission backs...

EU Commission backs new fossil gas projects

The European Commission will tomorrow propose plans to subsidise new fossil gas pipelines, terminals and storage facilities which could import gas that would emit more carbon than Austria and Denmark combined, according to our analysis.

Projects including the EastMed pipeline between Israel and Greece and the Baltic Pipe carrying Norwegian gas to Denmark and Poland feature on the Commission’s fifth “Projects of Common Interest” list, making them eligible for EU funds and fast-tracked permits.[1]

Of the many gas projects the Commission has proposed, six would import gas from new sources that could emit over 87 million tonnes of climate-wrecking carbon dioxide each year. This is more than Austria and Denmark’s combined carbon dioxide emissions in 2020.

Tara Connolly, senior gas campaigner at Global Witness said:

The EU talks a good game on climate leadership at COP26, but it continues to subsidise fossil fuel projects back home. This is beyond hypocrisy, it shows a fundamental unwillingness to confront the fossil fuel interests that are causing the climate emergency.

“We are on track for a catastrophic level of global heating that would make the planet uninhabitable for billions of people – ending public support for fossil fuel projects should be the absolute bare minimum for climate policy.”

Speaking ahead of the COP26 climate summit, European Commission President von der Leyen said: “We… …need sufficient commitments to really cut the emissions this decade. Science is very clear on that. Science tells us that it is urgent.

Over 100 civil society organisations from across Europe have called for fossil gas projects to be removed from the list.

The news comes after we revealed how ENTSOG, the EU body responsible for gas infrastructure planning, is refusing to disclose whether it has a conflict-of-interest policy, amid concerns about overlaps in its memberships and boardroom with a fossil gas industry lobby group.

Barnaby Pace, Senior Gas Campaigner at Global Witness said:

The potential for a conflict of interest could not be more obvious, but the gas regulator ENTSOG is refusing to disclose the meetings it’s had with the gas lobby, or even say whether it has a conflicts of interest policy. 

“This absurd state of affairs has gone hand in hand with over €4bn in subsidies being handed out to fossil gas projects which are fuelling the climate crisis. The fossil gas industry needs to be kicked out of political decision-making for good.”

Supported byClarion Owners Engineers
Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

EU verifier guidance tightens evidence requirements for CBAM electricity

New European Commission guidance has shifted the European Union’s carbon border levy for imported electricity from a largely regulatory requirement into a detailed verification process involving hourly network evidence, declarant-specific allocations and a clear separation between advisory support and...

EU verification rules reshape the route for Serbian green power

Serbian wind and solar developers seeking access to lower carbon costs in the European Union now face a route-to-market decision that goes beyond simply selling renewable electricity. Under the European Commission’s emerging framework, each qualifying electricity export must be...

Electrification Action Plan targets 46% electricity share of EU final energy by 2040

The European Commission has presented an Electrification Action Plan aimed at lifting electricity’s share of final EU energy consumption from approximately 23% today to 46% by 2040. The strategy is designed to move industrial heat, transport and buildings away...
Supported byVirtu Energy