Supported byClarion Energy
HomeMarketsBanks return to...

Banks return to SEE wind and solar, but the financing test becomes more demanding

Southeast European renewable financing is becoming deeper, but August showed that lenders are concentrating capital on larger projects with experienced sponsors and credible routes to market.

Romania again provided the clearest evidence.

BCR and Erste Group agreed around €132 million of construction financing for Scatec’s 77 MW Urleasca wind farm, with BCR providing approximately €76 million.

The financing forms part of a wider lending push.

BCR said it had financed around €450 million of Romanian energy investments during the first half of 2026, including more than €362 million for renewable projects.

Approximately €288 million went to wind, €41 million to solar and €33 million to batteries.

The strong wind allocation is notable after several years in which regional pipelines became increasingly solar-heavy.

One reason is revenue diversification.

Solar generation is becoming more concentrated into lower-priced midday periods, while wind offers a different production profile.

That does not make wind automatically superior.

It does make the relationship between production shape and realised market price increasingly important to bank models.

Lenders are consequently moving beyond simple annual generation assumptions.

Curtailment, balancing costs, negative-price exposure, merchant periods and grid constraints are receiving greater attention.

The traditional renewable financing model was relatively straightforward when projects relied on feed-in tariffs or long-term fixed-price PPAs.

Merchant exposure makes underwriting more complex.

This favours larger sponsors capable of managing several assets, signing sophisticated PPAs and absorbing periods of weak market pricing.

It may make financing harder for small standalone projects without contractual revenue protection.

The SEE lending market is therefore becoming more mature rather than simply more generous.

Capital is returning, but banks are increasingly pricing project structure, sponsor quality and market exposure rather than treating all renewable MW as equivalent.

Supported byClarion Owners Engineers
Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

373 MW of battery projects attract EBRD financing in Romania, Bulgaria

Battery storage projects in Romania and Bulgaria are drawing EBRD-backed financing, while a project in North Macedonia has sovereign and concessional support. Lenders need to test technical performance, grid access, market revenues and debt-service coverage under realistic downside scenarios.

Bulgaria leads Southeast Europe with more than 6.2 GW of battery storage

By late 2026, Southeast Europe’s battery-storage markets had diverged in operating scale, financing precedents, policy support and grid access. Bulgaria led on capacity, while other markets offered different combinations of bankability, growth potential and risk.

Battery warranties shape financing as Southeast Europe plans 400 MWh systems

Battery warranties are becoming financial-model inputs as storage projects in Southeast Europe move beyond two-hour designs. Guarantees on cycles, retained capacity and availability can affect debt sizing, revenue assumptions and terminal value.
Supported byVirtu Energy