Supported byClarion Energy
HomeNews Serbia EnergySerbia, Country is...

Serbia, Country is planning to connect to Druzhba oil pipeline

Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic said that the EU has postponed a decision to ban Russian oil imports until 1 December.

Earlier this week, the Western Balkans has not been exempted from the latest package of EU energy sanctions against Russia, due to Serbia’s close ties to Moscow. The EU member states agreed that Serbia should not profit from the derogation, because its has not introduced sanctions against Russia. Therefore, Serbia will not be able to import Russian crude oil through Croatian JANAF oil pipeline.

The Ministry of Mining and Energy announced that it is looking into all the options of securing the diversification of crude oil supply. The statement from the Ministry said that, in order for Serbia to have security in the supply of crude oil which is processed at the Pancevo refinery and meets the need of the local market, it is necessary to have the option of getting oil from several directions.

The diversification plan entails the construction of new oil pipelines, in addition to the existing JANAF, primarily the connection to Druzhba pipeline in Hungary.

There are two options for connecting to the Druzhba oil pipeline. The first is to build a pipeline to Szeged in Hungary. The route of that pipeline, which would secure a partial capacity for the supply of the Pancevo refinery, would be around 128 kilometers long, of which 104 kilometers would be in the territory of Serbia, and the estimated value of the investment is 83 million euros, of which 64 million for the construction in the Serbian territory.

The second option for connecting to the Druzhba pipeline near Budapest is to build a 400 kilometers long pipeline to Novi Sad from Szazhalombatta, with the estimated value of the investment is around 240 million euros.

According to the Ministry, connecting with the Druzhba pipeline means the possibility for the market in Serbia to keep getting Russian crude oil.

Energy experts have already criticized the proposal, calling it purely political, since it substitutes the supply via one EU member state with the supply via another EU member state, offering no real protection against EU sanctions, nor real diversification of supply routes.

Supported byClarion Owners Engineers
Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Djerdap 3 pumped-storage: Bechtel-Enka qualifies as Serbia prepares planning

Serbia has advanced work on the proposed Djerdap 3 pumped-storage hydropower project, with a Bechtel-Enka consortium qualifying for the next stage of government negotiations. At the same time, a Serbian engineering consortium is preparing the project’s planning framework. The...

Domestic industrial PPAs open new revenue opportunities for Serbian and Montenegrin renewables

Domestic industrial demand can support renewable investment and improve electricity cost predictability, but the carbon value of a power purchase agreement depends on the products being exported and the emissions rules governing them. Renewable developers in Serbia and Montenegro have...

Serbian renewable projects face new contractual challenges on the Hungary export corridor

Export PPAs can expand market access for wind and solar projects, but the revenue ultimately reaching developers depends on delivery rights, trading costs and the share of output that qualifies for actual-emissions treatment. Serbian wind and solar developers targeting Hungarian...
Supported byVirtu Energy