Supported byClarion Energy
HomeOilCroatia and Hungary...

Croatia and Hungary clash over energy transit and alleged wartime profiteering

Tensions between Croatia and Hungary have intensified following statements from Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto, who accused Croatia of profiting from wartime conditions in the energy sector. His remarks provoked strong reactions from both the Croatian Government and JANAF, the operator of the Croatian oil pipeline.

JANAF rejected Szijjarto’s claims, calling them false and misleading. The company emphasized its full capability to meet the crude oil supply needs of MOL’s Central European refineries, citing recent capacity tests as evidence. JANAF also clarified that its transport tariffs are transparent, legally compliant, and applied equally to all partners. The pricing methodology, validated by international consultants, is considered a model of global best practice. The company noted that other refineries along the pipeline transport significantly larger volumes than MOL, despite serving smaller markets.

Croatian President Zoran Milanovic dismissed Hungary’s accusations as exaggerated and unnecessary. He highlighted Croatia’s robust infrastructure, including its coastline and LNG capacity, which surpasses domestic demand and can support neighboring countries without direct access to the sea. Milanovic stressed that services cannot be provided for free but reaffirmed that Croatia remains a reliable energy partner, pointing out that MOL manages the Rijeka refinery as part of its ownership stake in INA.

Hungary, however, maintains a critical stance. Minister Szijjarto argued that if Hungary relied entirely on Croatia for energy transit, the JANAF pipeline would not be able to deliver sufficient volumes to ensure uninterrupted supply for both Hungary and Slovakia. He reiterated that Hungary will not tolerate what he described as Croatian profiteering, which could undermine domestic policies aimed at reducing household energy costs.

The dispute is further complicated by longstanding disagreements between MOL and JANAF over transport arrangements. Hungary continues to import significant amounts of Russian oil via the Druzhba pipeline, while Croatia has consistently pushed for diversification and regional energy security. Despite their alliance within the EU and NATO, this latest exchange highlights persistent energy-related tensions in their bilateral relationship.

Supported byClarion Owners Engineers
Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Hungary granted temporary EU delay on Serbia gas capacity bundling rules

Hungary has received temporary approval from the European Commission to postpone full implementation of EU gas-capacity rules at its border with Serbia until the 2027/2028 gas year. The derogation relates to requirements that cross-border pipeline capacity be offered as...

MVM begins foundations for 1 GW combined-cycle plant at Tiszaujvaros

Hungarian state-owned utility MVM has started foundation work on a new 1,000 MW combined-cycle gas-fired power plant at the former Tisza II site in Tiszaujvaros. The project is part of Hungary’s broader shift in generation needs as variable renewables...

Italy and Croatia see higher LNG inflows as Greek receipts decline

LNG inflows increased in Italy and Croatia during the week to 20 September, adding to imported gas availability as European markets prepared for the upcoming winter withdrawal season. Italy recorded 4,373.49 GWh of LNG inflows, an increase of 23.37% from...
Supported byVirtu Energy