Supported byClarion Energy
HomeOilCroatia and Hungary...

Croatia and Hungary clash over energy transit and alleged wartime profiteering

Tensions between Croatia and Hungary have intensified following statements from Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto, who accused Croatia of profiting from wartime conditions in the energy sector. His remarks provoked strong reactions from both the Croatian Government and JANAF, the operator of the Croatian oil pipeline.

JANAF rejected Szijjarto’s claims, calling them false and misleading. The company emphasized its full capability to meet the crude oil supply needs of MOL’s Central European refineries, citing recent capacity tests as evidence. JANAF also clarified that its transport tariffs are transparent, legally compliant, and applied equally to all partners. The pricing methodology, validated by international consultants, is considered a model of global best practice. The company noted that other refineries along the pipeline transport significantly larger volumes than MOL, despite serving smaller markets.

Croatian President Zoran Milanovic dismissed Hungary’s accusations as exaggerated and unnecessary. He highlighted Croatia’s robust infrastructure, including its coastline and LNG capacity, which surpasses domestic demand and can support neighboring countries without direct access to the sea. Milanovic stressed that services cannot be provided for free but reaffirmed that Croatia remains a reliable energy partner, pointing out that MOL manages the Rijeka refinery as part of its ownership stake in INA.

Hungary, however, maintains a critical stance. Minister Szijjarto argued that if Hungary relied entirely on Croatia for energy transit, the JANAF pipeline would not be able to deliver sufficient volumes to ensure uninterrupted supply for both Hungary and Slovakia. He reiterated that Hungary will not tolerate what he described as Croatian profiteering, which could undermine domestic policies aimed at reducing household energy costs.

The dispute is further complicated by longstanding disagreements between MOL and JANAF over transport arrangements. Hungary continues to import significant amounts of Russian oil via the Druzhba pipeline, while Croatia has consistently pushed for diversification and regional energy security. Despite their alliance within the EU and NATO, this latest exchange highlights persistent energy-related tensions in their bilateral relationship.

Supported byClarion Owners Engineers
Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Acciona Energia commissions 72 MW Croatian wind under 12-year contracts for difference

Acciona Energia has commissioned 72 MW of wind capacity in Croatia under 12-year contracts for difference, expanding its operating footprint as it develops large-scale solar. The commissioning brings the company’s Croatian operating portfolio to 102 MW across three wind...

Croatia amends Electricity Market Act to expand aggregation, grid studies, and connection rights

Croatia’s amended Electricity Market Act entered into force on October 15, 2026, introducing changes that go beyond conventional electricity-market reform. The legislation reshapes the commercial roles for industrial flexibility, the preparation of grid-connection studies, and the duration of legacy...

Hungary stockpiles 4.8 billion cubic metres for a 96-day winter gas buffer

Underground inventories ahead of the heating season Hungary has accumulated more than 4.8 billion cubic metres of natural gas in underground storage facilities, enough to cover approximately 96 days of total winter demand. The Ministry of Economy and Energy says...
Supported byVirtu Energy