2030–2035 scenario annex: Gas...

Scenario one: High volatility, tight LNG markets In a scenario characterised by global LNG...

What the European gas...

The European natural gas market has moved decisively away from its pre-2020 equilibrium....

Policy without borders: How...

Electricity market coupling is often discussed in technical or commercial terms, but its...

Fragmented convergence: Why Southeast...

For much of the past decade, the dominant assumption shaping policy and market...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsMontenegro: Key projects...

Montenegro: Key projects at Pljevlja thermal power plant

Montenegro’s Minister of Energy, Saša Mujović, visited the Pljevlja Thermal Power Plant, emphasizing its significance as a vital asset for the country’s energy sector. During his visit, he reviewed progress on the ecological reconstruction project, which is crucial for the power system of Montenegro.

Mujović highlighted the importance of simultaneously relocating the Ćehotina River and implementing the ecological reconstruction. He stated, “We aim to have the Pljevlja Thermal Power Plant operational by November 2025.” He stressed that delays in the reconstruction could jeopardize coal supplies, affecting electricity production.

Praising the management of both the Coal Mine and the Thermal Power Plant, Mujović noted their responsible handling of the projects. He warned that any hesitance in legal solutions could be costly for Montenegro, given the volatile nature of electricity prices.

The minister assured that the ecological reconstruction would comply with European standards, aiming to reduce sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter, and noise levels. He also mentioned plans to improve heating in Pljevlja by phasing out coal as the primary energy source for heating, which he believes will enhance ecological, health, and economic conditions in the city.

The estimated cost for the ecological reconstruction project ranges from 70 to 80 million euros, while relocating the Ćehotina River is projected to cost around 20 million euros. Mujović acknowledged the challenges posed by fluctuating labor and material prices, as well as potential delays in electricity production.

He concluded by stating that despite the hurdles, it is essential to invest in the energy sector for the well-being of citizens, asserting, “The health of our citizens has no price, and investments will yield returns.”

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

2030–2035 scenario annex: Gas prices, CBAM and export margins

Scenario one: High volatility, tight LNG markets In a scenario characterised by global LNG tightness, regulatory uncertainty, and persistent geopolitical risk, European gas prices remain volatile with frequent spikes. Average prices may moderate, but extreme events become more common. Under this...

Gas vs electricity procurement: Strategic choices fo Serbian exporters

Serbian exporters increasingly face a strategic choice: treat gas and electricity as separate procurement streams or integrate them into a unified energy risk strategy. The latter approach is rapidly becoming essential. Gas procurement indexed fully to TTF offers flexibility but...

Electricity prices, production costs, and export competitiveness: What Serbian manufacturers face when selling into the EU

Electricity pricing has shifted from a background cost to a central competitive variable for Serbian export-oriented production. For companies selling into the European Union, power prices now influence operating margins, contract structure, carbon exposure, and long-term bankability. This is...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!