2030–2035 scenario annex: Gas...

Scenario one: High volatility, tight LNG markets In a scenario characterised by global LNG...

What the European gas...

The European natural gas market has moved decisively away from its pre-2020 equilibrium....

Policy without borders: How...

Electricity market coupling is often discussed in technical or commercial terms, but its...

Fragmented convergence: Why Southeast...

For much of the past decade, the dominant assumption shaping policy and market...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsCroatia: Zagreb Mayor...

Croatia: Zagreb Mayor comments on Administrative Court ruling in gas service dispute

Zagreb Mayor Tomislav Tomasevic announced earlier this week that the Administrative Court did not rule on the merits of the lawsuit filed by Gradska Plinara Zagreb against the energy market regulatory authority HERA. Instead, the court declined to grant a suspensive effect, which would have temporarily halted HERA’s decision to appoint Medjimurje Plin as the public service provider starting October 1.

Tomasevic clarified that the court’s decision pertains only to the suspensive effect and not to the underlying legality of HERA’s decision, which GPZO contests as illegal. He stated that the Administrative Court’s ruling does not address the core issues of the case.

While he could not yet disclose the number of citizens who have chosen to remain customers of Gradska Plinara Zagreb – Opskrba (GPZO), he indicated that the response has exceeded his expectations. This information, currently deemed commercially sensitive, will be made public soon.

Reports indicate that the Administrative Court rejected GPZO’s request aimed at HERA and indirectly at Medjimurje Plin regarding the selection of a public service provider for Zagreb. HERA had previously selected Medjimurje Plin over GPZO for this role.

The court dismissed GPZO’s argument that their lawsuit warranted a suspensive effect, which they claimed would prevent a projected annual revenue loss of €222 million based on 2023 financial reports, potentially jeopardizing the company’s operations. Medjimurje Plin opposed the request, asserting that HERA’s decision was based on errors and irregularities not in line with the Gas Market Act.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

2030–2035 scenario annex: Gas prices, CBAM and export margins

Scenario one: High volatility, tight LNG markets In a scenario characterised by global LNG tightness, regulatory uncertainty, and persistent geopolitical risk, European gas prices remain volatile with frequent spikes. Average prices may moderate, but extreme events become more common. Under this...

What the European gas market means for Serbia-based producers and exporters

The European natural gas market has moved decisively away from its pre-2020 equilibrium. Price formation, supply security, and cost competitiveness are no longer primarily dictated by long-term contracts and pipeline marginal costs. Instead, they are shaped by a volatile...

Policy without borders: How Montenegro–Italy coupling constrains domestic energy intervention

Electricity market coupling is often discussed in technical or commercial terms, but its most profound effects are political. By linking Montenegro’s market directly to Italy’s, coupling effectively removes the border as a buffer between domestic energy policy and European...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!