Financing wind in Montenegro,...

The landscape of renewable finance in Southeast Europe has undergone a profound transformation....

How Southeast Europe’s grid...

Wind development in Southeast Europe is accelerating at a pace unimaginable only a...

Serbia–Romania–Croatia: The new triangular...

For years, the Iberian Peninsula defined what a wind powerhouse looked like inside...

The bankability gap in...

The transformation of Southeast Europe into a credible wind-investment region has been rapid,...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsBosnia and Herzegovina,...

Bosnia and Herzegovina, Future of the planned 450 MW Tuzla 7 lignite plant is again in doubt

The future of the planned 450 MW Tuzla 7 lignite plant in Bosnia and Herzegovina is again in doubt after the country’s State Aid Council revoked its decision to approve a public guarantee for a EUR 614 million loan from China Eximbank last week, four years after the Council’s initial clearance.

The State Aid Council’s 2018 decision to greenlight the loan guarantee was found in breach of State aid legislation by the Energy Community Secretariat in an infringement case against Bosnia and Herzegovina at the Ministerial Council in November 2021.

The case was opened based on a complaint by the Aarhus Centre Sarajevo and Bankwatch. In its decision, the Ministerial Council found that Bosnia and Herzegovina failed to comply with its obligations under Article 18 of the Treaty, on the prohibition of market-distorting State aid.

The guarantee for Tuzla 7 covered 100 percent of the loan, plus interest and other associated costs, but as a contracting party to the Energy Community treaty, Bosnia and Herzegovina must follow EU rules on subsidies in the energy sector. One of them is that in most cases state guarantees may only cover up to 80 percent of the total loan amount.

Tuzla 7’s woes were compounded last year when it was revealed that the contractor itself, China’s Gezhouba, can no longer fulfil its contract due the withdrawal of GE as an equipment supplier. However, the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina government and parliament appear reluctant to take a final decision on the fate of the project, Bankwatch writes.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Financing wind in Montenegro, Serbia, Croatia and Romania — why international lenders are returning to Southeast Europe

The landscape of renewable finance in Southeast Europe has undergone a profound transformation. A decade ago, lenders viewed the region with a degree of caution, shaped by fluctuating regulatory frameworks, limited track records, and the perceived fragility of local...

How Southeast Europe’s grid bottlenecks will reshape project valuation, offtake strategy and EPC designs by 2030

Wind development in Southeast Europe is accelerating at a pace unimaginable only a decade ago, yet the region’s grid infrastructure is straining under the weight of its own renewable ambition. Serbia is preparing for multi-gigawatt expansion, Romania is restarting...

Serbia–Romania–Croatia: The new triangular wind corridor — is Southeast Europe becoming Europe’s next Iberia?

For years, the Iberian Peninsula defined what a wind powerhouse looked like inside Europe: strong resource, open land, grid-ready corridors, competitive auctions, and the steady inflow of international capital. Investors seeking scale, yield, and policy clarity migrated naturally towards...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!