2030–2035 scenario annex: Gas...

Scenario one: High volatility, tight LNG markets In a scenario characterised by global LNG...

What the European gas...

The European natural gas market has moved decisively away from its pre-2020 equilibrium....

Policy without borders: How...

Electricity market coupling is often discussed in technical or commercial terms, but its...

Fragmented convergence: Why Southeast...

For much of the past decade, the dominant assumption shaping policy and market...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeNews Serbia EnergySerbia seeks short-term...

Serbia seeks short-term extension of Gazprom gas deal amid EU policy uncertainty

Serbia’s long-term natural gas strategy has entered a period of uncertainty, prompting Belgrade to prioritize extending its current supply arrangement with Russia’s Gazprom rather than securing a new multi-year agreement. According to Srbijagas Director Dušan Bajatović, the EU’s plan to gradually phase out imports of Russian pipeline gas and LNG has fundamentally reshaped the negotiating landscape. As a result, Serbia now expects its existing contract to be prolonged only through the current heating season — and possibly for no more than a year. Bajatović added that once the temporary extension expires, negotiating conditions may become more favorable for discussing a longer-term deal.

To mitigate potential supply risks, Srbijagas has already prepared several contingency scenarios. These include relying on substantial reserve volumes, sufficient to cover national consumption for around 70 days, and turning to spot-market purchases if necessary. Although Belgrade is treating all possibilities seriously, Bajatović said Russian officials continue to insist that interrupting deliveries to Serbia would be inconceivable.

Serbia’s present supply arrangement is based on a three-year contract signed in 2022 for up to 2.2 billion cubic meters of gas annually. Although the agreement formally expired in May, it has been extended multiple times — first through late September, then into October, and most recently until the end of December. Belgrade had initially hoped to negotiate a new three-year contract for 2.5 billion cubic meters per year, but developments in EU policy have complicated those efforts.

In October, the Council of the EU endorsed a proposal to introduce a phased ban on imports of Russian pipeline gas and LNG beginning in January 2026. According to the proposal, existing short-term supply contracts may continue until mid-June 2026, while longer-term arrangements can stay in force until early 2028. The announcement triggered concerns in Serbia, where officials emphasized that the country relies heavily on Russian gas delivered through the TurkStream extension via Bulgaria. EU Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos later clarified that the regulation would not restrict the transit of Russian gas to Serbia.

President Aleksandar Vučić has suggested that Gazprom may prefer short-term extensions rather than concluding a new multi-year agreement, potentially to preserve negotiating leverage amid ongoing uncertainty surrounding NIS — the Serbian oil company indirectly controlled by Gazprom that is currently subject to U.S. sanctions. Bajatović, however, downplayed any direct connection, saying he does not see an immediate link between the two issues.

Serbia expects to consume around 2.7 billion cubic meters of natural gas this year. In addition to Russian volumes, the country supplements its supply with approximately 400 million cubic meters of Azeri gas imported through the Bulgaria–Serbia interconnector.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

2030–2035 scenario annex: Gas prices, CBAM and export margins

Scenario one: High volatility, tight LNG markets In a scenario characterised by global LNG tightness, regulatory uncertainty, and persistent geopolitical risk, European gas prices remain volatile with frequent spikes. Average prices may moderate, but extreme events become more common. Under this...

Gas–power flexibility models for Serbian industries

Flexibility as a cost-control mechanism Flexibility has become the primary tool for managing gas-driven volatility. In the Serbian context, flexibility does not mean eliminating gas use but managing when and how gas and electricity are consumed. At the system level, flexibility...

Gas vs electricity procurement: Strategic choices fo Serbian exporters

Serbian exporters increasingly face a strategic choice: treat gas and electricity as separate procurement streams or integrate them into a unified energy risk strategy. The latter approach is rapidly becoming essential. Gas procurement indexed fully to TTF offers flexibility but...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!