Montenegro as a wind...

Montenegro is not the largest renewable market in Southeast Europe. It does not...

De-risking wind in Southeast...

From an Owner’s Engineer’s vantage point, Southeast Europe’s onshore wind market is entering...

Investor brief: How risk...

Investing in a wind park is fundamentally about converting a natural resource into...

The Balkan grid at...

As winter settles across South-East Europe, the region’s electricity landscape enters a season...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeNews Serbia EnergySerbia: Public debate...

Serbia: Public debate on EIA study for TENT complex

Termoelektrane Nikola Tesla (TENT) consists of four thermal power plants Nikola Tesla A, Nikola Tesla B, Kolubara and Morava with total installed capacity of 3,288 MW. With total power output of 1,650 MW, TPP Nikola Tesla A is the largest thermal power plant in Serbia and generates around 30 % of its total electricity production.

Serbian Ministry of Environmental Protection launched a public debate on the environmental impact assessment (EIA) study of the Nikola Tesla thermal power plant (TENT) complex.

State-owned power utility EPS is planning a reconstruction of units A1 and A2 of its TENT A thermal power plant in order to lower emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and suspended particulate matter. The public debate on the document needed for the reconstruction project will start on 25 June.

EPS is planning to extend the operational life of units A1 and A2 at TPP TENT A by at least 15 years and to increase their power output. Units A3, A4, A5 and A6 are above 300 MW each and the company has the obligation to bring units above that threshold into compliance with the European Union’s Directive on Industrial Emissions by the end of 2023.

Units A1 and A2 have 210 MW installed capacity each, which will be increased to 225 MW with the reconstruction. The study is based on the levels of waste that was generated, air quality and the consumption of fuel and water in 2018. The reconstruction proposal contains all necessary measures of environmental protection, in line with international contracts, for over 15 years, which is how long the units are envisaged to operate after the renewal. Net efficiency is projected to be increased to 32.4 % from 31 % and both the emissions of pollutants into the air and transboundary pollution will be reduced.

 

 

 

 

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

The competitive edge: How Clarion’s EPC execution framework helps Serbia attract international capital and technology

As competition for investment intensifies across Central and Southeastern Europe, Serbia must distinguish itself not only through incentives and geography, but through execution capability. Global investors increasingly prefer markets where risk can be measured, controlled, and contractually allocated. They invest where...

Bankability starts with engineering: Why lenders are now demanding EPC risk matrices, ITPs and grid readiness in Serbia

Project finance is changing rapidly. What lenders once accepted as “EPC contractor reputation” has evolved into a rigorous, quantifiable requirement: engineering traceability, risk transparency, and asset-level assurance. Lenders across Europe and the Western Balkans are tightening due-diligence criteria as energy markets...

Engineering certainty in an uncertain world: Why Serbia’s energy & industrial projects now depend on professional EPC risk governance

Serbia is entering the most aggressive investment cycle in its modern energy and industrial history. Billions of euros in renewable assets, grid infrastructure, industrial expansion and high-tech facilities are converging on a system still adapting to European standards, rapid...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!