Transelectrica launches major projects...

Romanian electricity transmission system operator Transelectrica has launched two major infrastructure projects to...

Romania launches third CfD...

The Romanian Ministry of Energy, in cooperation with Transelectrica, the operator of the...

Montenegro: EPA clears two...

Montenegro’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has decided that Unipan Green, a local company,...

Slovenia: Šoštanj thermal power...

At the end of September, the Šoštanj thermal power plant began an extensive...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeNews Serbia EnergySerbia faces pressure...

Serbia faces pressure to end Russian ownership of NIS amid US sanctions

In response to the latest round of US sanctions, Serbia faces pressure to sever its ties with Russian ownership in the National Oil Company of Serbia (NIS), its largest energy company. The US sanctions, imposed on January 10 by the outgoing Biden administration, target Russian oil and gas revenues, including Gazprom subsidiaries in multiple countries, specifically NIS Novi Sad, which plays a vital role in Serbia’s energy infrastructure. This development comes as part of broader measures aimed at weakening Russia’s energy sector amid ongoing geopolitical tensions.

Since 2008, Russia’s state-owned Gazprom Neft has held a majority stake of 56.15% in NIS, with Serbia holding 29.87%. Despite the Russian ownership, NIS remains a crucial part of Serbia’s economy, generating €3.3 billion in revenue last year, which accounts for 4.5% of the country’s GDP. However, the US has made it clear that for Serbia to avoid further sanctions and reduce risks, it must completely divest Russian interests from NIS.

Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić has stated that Serbia has 45 days to resolve the situation. The US Assistant Secretary of State, James O’Brien, emphasized that the risk of sanctions will only be fully mitigated if Serbia removes all Russian ownership, noting that Serbia’s future lies in stronger ties with European and American businesses. O’Brien also pointed out that Russia’s acquisition of NIS was done at a very low price, yet it has likely siphoned billions of euros from Serbia in recent years. Critics of the 2008 deal argue that Serbia sold a significant stake in its energy sector too cheaply—€400 million plus a promised €550 million in investment.

Vučić has previously hinted at the possibility of Serbia “taking over” NIS, and although he suggested that Serbia could afford to buy out the Russian stake without borrowing, he indicated that such a move would end up benefiting Russia financially. The situation underscores the growing tension between Serbia’s aspirations to align more closely with the European Union and the economic and political influence of Russia in the region.

As the deadline looms, Serbia must navigate a delicate balance between addressing Western pressure and preserving its economic interests, while also considering the geopolitical implications of further distancing itself from Russia.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Serbia: EU confirms Russian gas ban will not affect transit deliveries

The European Union has confirmed that its upcoming ban on Russian gas imports will not affect gas deliveries transiting through EU member states to non-EU countries such as Serbia, according to Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos. Responding to reports in Serbian...

MOL refinery fire under control as Hungary assesses impact on fuel supply

Hungarian oil and gas company MOL announced that it has started restarting unaffected units at its Danube refinery after a major overnight fire. Fire crews remain on-site as safety inspections continue. The company confirmed that the fire is now...

EU approves phased ban on Russian gas, Serbia faces supply challenges

The Council of the European Union has approved a draft regulation introducing a phased ban on imports of Russian natural gas. Under the new rules, imports of Russian gas—whether by pipeline or in liquefied form—will be prohibited starting 1...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!