The Balkan grid at...

As winter settles across South-East Europe, the region’s electricity landscape enters a season...

The Balkan power mosaic:...

The final month of 2025 finds the electricity markets of South-East Europe entering...

Winter markets at the...

The western edge of the Balkan electricity system enters December 2025 with a...

Winter prices without the...

December 2025 opens the winter season in Central and South-East Europe with a...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeNews Serbia EnergySerbia faces pressure...

Serbia faces pressure to end Russian ownership of NIS amid US sanctions

In response to the latest round of US sanctions, Serbia faces pressure to sever its ties with Russian ownership in the National Oil Company of Serbia (NIS), its largest energy company. The US sanctions, imposed on January 10 by the outgoing Biden administration, target Russian oil and gas revenues, including Gazprom subsidiaries in multiple countries, specifically NIS Novi Sad, which plays a vital role in Serbia’s energy infrastructure. This development comes as part of broader measures aimed at weakening Russia’s energy sector amid ongoing geopolitical tensions.

Since 2008, Russia’s state-owned Gazprom Neft has held a majority stake of 56.15% in NIS, with Serbia holding 29.87%. Despite the Russian ownership, NIS remains a crucial part of Serbia’s economy, generating €3.3 billion in revenue last year, which accounts for 4.5% of the country’s GDP. However, the US has made it clear that for Serbia to avoid further sanctions and reduce risks, it must completely divest Russian interests from NIS.

Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić has stated that Serbia has 45 days to resolve the situation. The US Assistant Secretary of State, James O’Brien, emphasized that the risk of sanctions will only be fully mitigated if Serbia removes all Russian ownership, noting that Serbia’s future lies in stronger ties with European and American businesses. O’Brien also pointed out that Russia’s acquisition of NIS was done at a very low price, yet it has likely siphoned billions of euros from Serbia in recent years. Critics of the 2008 deal argue that Serbia sold a significant stake in its energy sector too cheaply—€400 million plus a promised €550 million in investment.

Vučić has previously hinted at the possibility of Serbia “taking over” NIS, and although he suggested that Serbia could afford to buy out the Russian stake without borrowing, he indicated that such a move would end up benefiting Russia financially. The situation underscores the growing tension between Serbia’s aspirations to align more closely with the European Union and the economic and political influence of Russia in the region.

As the deadline looms, Serbia must navigate a delicate balance between addressing Western pressure and preserving its economic interests, while also considering the geopolitical implications of further distancing itself from Russia.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Serbia’s energy dilemma: EPS faces a slow-burning crisis amid calls for accountability

For decades, Serbia’s national utility, Elektroprivreda Srbije (EPS), operated under the illusion of indestructibility. Its sprawling lignite mines, ageing thermal plants and hydropower dams formed the backbone of a system that appeared resistant to regional shocks, political storms and...

Serbia’s energy future at stake in post-Russia gas power struggle

For more than two decades, Serbia’s political and economic stability rested on a simple, unwritten assumption: Russian gas would continue to flow, reliably, predictably and at preferential terms negotiated quietly between Belgrade and Moscow. The relationship was never merely...

Sanctions on NIS trigger Serbia’s most severe financial stress test in a generation

When the United States expanded its sanctions targeting Russian energy interests, few policymakers in Belgrade initially grasped the magnitude of what was unfolding. On the surface, nothing had changed: Serbia’s biggest oil company, NIS, majority-owned by Gazprom Neft, continued...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!