Financing wind in Montenegro,...

The landscape of renewable finance in Southeast Europe has undergone a profound transformation....

How Southeast Europe’s grid...

Wind development in Southeast Europe is accelerating at a pace unimaginable only a...

Serbia–Romania–Croatia: The new triangular...

For years, the Iberian Peninsula defined what a wind powerhouse looked like inside...

The bankability gap in...

The transformation of Southeast Europe into a credible wind-investment region has been rapid,...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsSEE region: Chinese...

SEE region: Chinese companies skipped the tender for construction of HPP Buk Bijela

Chinese companies submitted three bids for the construction of the “Buk Bijela” hydroelectric power plant in the Republika Srpska (RS), worth around 250 million euros, confirmed Milan Bastinac, Assistant Minister for Energy of the RS.

According to the agreement on the establishment of the joint enterprise Hydroelectric Power Plant Gornja Drina between Serbia and RS from 2020, in addition to “Buk Bijela”, the construction of two more hydroelectric power plants on the rivers Drina, Foca, and Paunci, in the east of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) is planned.

How did the job negotiation go?

Everything was done at the invitation of the company “Hydro-Energy System Gornja Drina” (HES Gornja Drina), a joint project of Elektroprivreda RS (ERS) and Serbia, which own 49 and 51 percent of shares in HES.

Milan Bastinac, Assistant Minister for Energy of the RS, also the Chairman of the Board of Directors of hydroelectric power plant Gornja Drina, says that the Chinese companies were chosen because of their “reputation and experience on similar projects in Serbia and RS”.

He also claims they did not need to call for a tender to invite Chinese companies, assessing that the Law on Public Procurement of BiH allows them to do so.

Moreover, Bastinac pointed out that there was no public invitation under the Law on Public Procurement, because “nominally, the project is carried out by a foreign company”.

“We have no obligation to act according to the Law on Public Procurement because the majority capital is a foreign company, that is, in this case, a company from Serbia (Elektroprivreda Srbije). Accordingly, we were not obliged to carry out the public procurement procedure,” Bastinac explained.

Doubts about the transparency of the project

Awarding large jobs to Chinese companies, without public insight into the contents of the contract, has become a practice in the RS, according to Transparency International BiH (TI BiH).

Damjan Ozegovic, from this organization, says that Chinese companies are mostly chosen through direct negotiation procedures or self-initiated offers, eliminating competition.

In this way, he believes, data from contracts that are paid for with public money are concealed without the possibility of insight into what and how it is spent, Slobodna Evropa reports.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Financing wind in Montenegro, Serbia, Croatia and Romania — why international lenders are returning to Southeast Europe

The landscape of renewable finance in Southeast Europe has undergone a profound transformation. A decade ago, lenders viewed the region with a degree of caution, shaped by fluctuating regulatory frameworks, limited track records, and the perceived fragility of local...

How Southeast Europe’s grid bottlenecks will reshape project valuation, offtake strategy and EPC designs by 2030

Wind development in Southeast Europe is accelerating at a pace unimaginable only a decade ago, yet the region’s grid infrastructure is straining under the weight of its own renewable ambition. Serbia is preparing for multi-gigawatt expansion, Romania is restarting...

Serbia–Romania–Croatia: The new triangular wind corridor — is Southeast Europe becoming Europe’s next Iberia?

For years, the Iberian Peninsula defined what a wind powerhouse looked like inside Europe: strong resource, open land, grid-ready corridors, competitive auctions, and the steady inflow of international capital. Investors seeking scale, yield, and policy clarity migrated naturally towards...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!