Weekly energy market overview:...

During the second week of December, Brent oil futures for the Front Month...

European electricity prices: Weekly...

In the second week of December, average electricity prices fell in most major...

European electricity demand trends:...

During the week of December 8, electricity demand decreased across major European markets...

Europe: Solar and wind...

During the week of December 8, solar photovoltaic (PV) energy production increased in...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeNews Serbia EnergyConstruction issue of...

Construction issue of HPP on Drina needs resolving by BiH concession commission

In mid-May, Republika Srpska Prime Minister Radovan Visković and Serbian Prime Minister Ana Brnabić laid the foundation stone for the first of three planned hydropower plants to be built on the Drina River together, although no BiH Constitutional Court had ruled on the issue.

The Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina has ordered the BiH Concessions Commission, in its capacity as a joint concessions commission, to resolve disputes between BiH and the Republika Srpska arising in connection with the award of concessions for the construction of hydropower plants on the Drina River.

The decision of July 16 was made based on the request of 24 members of the BiH Parliamentary Assembly to resolve the dispute between BiH and BiH. entity of Republika Srpska due to the construction of hydroelectric power plants on the Drina River, which RS plans to build with neighboring Serbia on the eastern border of BiH.

“The Constitutional Court has made a partial decision on admissibility and merits,” the BiH Constitutional Court said in a statement.

A maximum period of three months has been given to resolve this issue from the date of delivery of this decision.

On November 13 last year, the entity prime ministers signed a statement on the implementation of the “Upper Drina” project, which plans to build three hydroelectric power plants in the upper Drina river basin, on the eastern border between BiH and Serbia, worth about 520m euros.

At that time, 24 deputies of the House of Representatives of the BiH Parliament sent a request to the BiH Constitutional Court to review the legality of the project.

They stated that the decision on that would have to be made exclusively by the state of BiH, and they found a basis for the request in the decision of the Constitutional Court of BiH which defines that “rivers represent property that can be disposed of exclusively by the state of BiH”.

The RS authorities are implementing this project in accordance with the provisions of the RS Law on Inland Navigation, which applies to all rivers in BiH entity, including the Drina, declared “RS internal waters”.

However, the Constitutional Court of BiH, by decision number U-9-19 in February 2020, declared that legal solution unconstitutional, explaining that rivers are property that can be disposed of exclusively by the state.

Source: slobodnaevropa.org

 

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Industrial self-generation and storage: Evolving from backup to strategic core

For most of Serbia’s industrial history, on-site power generation and storage occupied a marginal role. Diesel generators existed for emergencies, gas engines for niche applications, and electrical storage was largely absent. These assets were treated as insurance policies—rarely used,...

Industrial PPAs in Serbia: The hidden costs of underperformance without storage

Power purchase agreements have become one of the most discussed instruments in Serbia’s industrial energy transition. For manufacturers under pressure to decarbonise, stabilise costs and demonstrate long-term energy security, PPAs appear to offer a clean solution. A renewable generator...

Industrial power strategies in Serbia: From fixed pricing to managing shape risk

For most Serbian industrial consumers, power hedging has historically meant one thing: securing a fixed price. The logic was simple and rational in a system dominated by coal and hydropower. Electricity prices moved slowly, volatility was limited, and the...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!