Financing wind in Montenegro,...

The landscape of renewable finance in Southeast Europe has undergone a profound transformation....

How Southeast Europe’s grid...

Wind development in Southeast Europe is accelerating at a pace unimaginable only a...

Serbia–Romania–Croatia: The new triangular...

For years, the Iberian Peninsula defined what a wind powerhouse looked like inside...

The bankability gap in...

The transformation of Southeast Europe into a credible wind-investment region has been rapid,...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsBulgaria, EU Court...

Bulgaria, EU Court rules country broke pollution law

  • The European Court of Justice (CJEU) confirmed yesterday that Bulgaria breached EU rules on air pollution because of failure to address sulphur dioxide (SO2) pollution from super-polluting coal plants.
  • The law in question is the Ambient Air Quality Directive.
  • Environmental organisations have hailed the ruling, saying that it should be a wake-up call for the Bulgarian authorities.

The court confirmed that people in the entire southeastern region of the country have lived in a highly polluting environment for years, due to illegal levels of SO2 pollution emanating from four large coal plants in the region – Brikel, and the three plants that make up the Maritsa Iztok complex. In 2021, after the Court started considering this case, a fifth coal plant was reopened in the region after years of inactivity.

SO2 pollution contributes to serious respiratory disorders and other major health issues, especially for vulnerable groups including children, elderly people and people with pre-existing respiratory conditions.

Meglena Antonova, campaigner at Greenpeace Bulgaria, said: “The decision is a breath of fresh air for the people living in the region. Toxic sulphur dioxide pollution caused by coal burning has to end. The government is propping up old coal-fired power plants but the price is being paid by public health and taxpayers’ money. In the current context, it’s clear that fossil fuels are not the answer – we should turn to people-powered renewables that let us breathe clean air and be energy independent.”

Justine Schoenfeld-Quinn, lawyer at environmental law charity ClientEarth, said: “Court rulings like this one are powerful. The law is there to protect people and this ruling – as well as regulatory changes like the stricter EU law on industrial pollution – should serve as a wake-up call for the Bulgarian government. Ministers should see the writing on the wall and start transitioning the country away from coal once and for all.”

Following this judgment, if the Bulgarian government doesn’t take steps to remedy the situation, the EU Commission can start a new procedure to demand the imposition of fines, Client Earth writes.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Financing wind in Montenegro, Serbia, Croatia and Romania — why international lenders are returning to Southeast Europe

The landscape of renewable finance in Southeast Europe has undergone a profound transformation. A decade ago, lenders viewed the region with a degree of caution, shaped by fluctuating regulatory frameworks, limited track records, and the perceived fragility of local...

How Southeast Europe’s grid bottlenecks will reshape project valuation, offtake strategy and EPC designs by 2030

Wind development in Southeast Europe is accelerating at a pace unimaginable only a decade ago, yet the region’s grid infrastructure is straining under the weight of its own renewable ambition. Serbia is preparing for multi-gigawatt expansion, Romania is restarting...

Serbia–Romania–Croatia: The new triangular wind corridor — is Southeast Europe becoming Europe’s next Iberia?

For years, the Iberian Peninsula defined what a wind powerhouse looked like inside Europe: strong resource, open land, grid-ready corridors, competitive auctions, and the steady inflow of international capital. Investors seeking scale, yield, and policy clarity migrated naturally towards...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!