Slovenia: NPP Krsko exceeds...

In September 2025, the Krsko nuclear power plant, jointly owned by Slovenia and...

Romania: Electrica completes 27...

Romanian electricity distributor and supplier Electrica has completed the construction of the Satu...

Romania: NEPI Rockcastle launches...

NEPI Rockcastle, the largest owner and operator of shopping centers in Central and...

Bulgaria: Bulgargaz secures LNG...

Bulgaria’s state-owned natural gas supplier Bulgargaz has completed a tender to meet part...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsBosnia and Herzegovina:...

Bosnia and Herzegovina: Negotiations over state guarantee for TPP Tuzla’s unit 7 end without agreement

The Energy Community Secretariat and representatives of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FBiH) terminated their negotiations related to the construction of unit 7 at coal-fired thermal power plant Tuzla without having reached an agreement. The negotiations became futile after the entity signed a guarantee agreement in November, without prior clarification of compliance with Energy Community state aid rules.

In April, the House of Peoples of the Parliament of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FBiH) confirmed that the FBiH will provide a guarantee for the 614 million euros loan from Chinese Exim Bank for the purpose of the construction of unit 7 at thermal power plant Tuzla. The guarantee was previously approved by the House of Representatives. Previously, the Energy Community Secretariat has sent an Opening Letter to Bosnia and Herzegovina in which it addressed its concerns regarding the state aid compliance of a public guarantee granted in favor of Chinese Exim Bank for a loan by the latter to the state-owned power utility EPBiH. This guarantee has been found by the State Aid Council of Bosnia and Herzegovina not to contain elements of state aid. By sending the Opening Letter, the Secretariat initiated a preliminary procedure, the purpose of which is to give Bosnia and Herzegovina the opportunity to react to the allegation of non-compliance with Energy Community law within two months and to enable the Secretariat to establish the full background of the case. In November 2017, EPBiH signed a loan agreement with Chinese Exim Bank for financing the construction of unit 7 at TPP Tuzla on the sidelines of a meeting of the heads of Governments of China and 16 Central and East European countries held in Budapest. The net agreed price under the EPC contract is 722.35 million euros (without VAT). The maturity of the loan from China’s Exim Bank is 20 years, with a 5-years grace period. The loan will cover 85 % of the investment, while the remaining 15 % will be provided from EPBiH’s own funds. TPP Tuzla has 6 units with overall output of 715 MW. New unit 7 will be replacement capacity for units 1 and 2 (32 MW each), which have already been shut down and units 3 (100 MW) and 4 (200 MW) which should be put out of operation in 2018, but will most likely continue to operate until 2020. When unit 7 is completed, it will provide almost a quarter of electricity produced by EPBiH.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

From Čačak to Europe: Nearshoring shared business services with regional talent and real connectivity

Čačak sits in the heart of Serbia with an asset mix that plays perfectly to near-sourcing: a deep regional talent catchment, motorways that cut transit times to major hubs, and operating costs that let you scale shared business services...

The new currency of trust: Where technical risk meets financial consequence

In modern infrastructure, oversight isn’t a paperwork ritual—it’s a translation exercise. Design choices, test results, and schedule slips must be converted into hard numbers a credit committee can act on. That alignment of technical risk with financial consequence has...

When ESG gaps halt financing: The Owner’s Engineer’s role in industrial projects

In industrial construction today, an ESG non-conformity can hold a loan tranche as effectively as a failed transformer test. Lenders and investors now expect the Owner’s Engineer (OE) to treat environmental, social, and governance risks with the same rigor...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!