Financing wind in Montenegro,...

The landscape of renewable finance in Southeast Europe has undergone a profound transformation....

How Southeast Europe’s grid...

Wind development in Southeast Europe is accelerating at a pace unimaginable only a...

Serbia–Romania–Croatia: The new triangular...

For years, the Iberian Peninsula defined what a wind powerhouse looked like inside...

The bankability gap in...

The transformation of Southeast Europe into a credible wind-investment region has been rapid,...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsBosnia and Herzegovina,...

Bosnia and Herzegovina, EPBiH will produce 10 % less electricity

Bosnian state-owned power utility EPBiH will produce 10 % less electricity in ints coal-fired thermal power plants than initially planned in the Energy Balance.

According to newly adopted 2023-2025 Business Plan of the company, lower electricity generation, caused by lower coal supply, will affect EPBiH’s ability to export electricity in this period.

Lower production of thermal power plants of about 500 GWh means that sales on the free market and exports could be halved, since EPBiH planned to sell a little over 1,000 GWh in 2023. The utility produces 75 to 85 % of its electricity from coal.

The company admitted that lower than planned production of coal-fired thermal power plants would have a negative impact on the planned electricity surpluses, but also on the planned financial results. Lower production can be largely attributed to the aging of thermal power plants.

It would also be the second annual decline in a row. A year ago, the company announced a drop in production for 2022, to 6,000 GWh, but the drop was even greater – 6,700 GWh of electricity was produced in 2021, and the production of 5,900 GWh is expected this year, followed by 5,800 GWh in 2023. The decrease in production in thermal power plants in 2022 is caused by a drop in coal supplies and deliveries.

EPBiH said that the Energy Balance for the 2023- 2025 period was made in the third quarter, when it was difficult to predict actual electricity production in 2022. When the Business Plan was completed a month ago, it was certain that the level of coal stocks in thermal power plants at the end of December would be significantly lower compared to the plan.

The company did not identify the reasons for lower coal supplies from its coal mines. However, due to the energy crisis, coal has become a highly demanded commodity, and in the first seven months of the year, BiH exported 207,000 tons compared to 88,000 tons last year. A good part went to Serbia because of problems with reduced coal production.

EPBiH also said that its new solar power plants will be put into operation later than planned, so that by 2025, only one (Resetnica) will enter commercial operation.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Financing wind in Montenegro, Serbia, Croatia and Romania — why international lenders are returning to Southeast Europe

The landscape of renewable finance in Southeast Europe has undergone a profound transformation. A decade ago, lenders viewed the region with a degree of caution, shaped by fluctuating regulatory frameworks, limited track records, and the perceived fragility of local...

How Southeast Europe’s grid bottlenecks will reshape project valuation, offtake strategy and EPC designs by 2030

Wind development in Southeast Europe is accelerating at a pace unimaginable only a decade ago, yet the region’s grid infrastructure is straining under the weight of its own renewable ambition. Serbia is preparing for multi-gigawatt expansion, Romania is restarting...

Serbia–Romania–Croatia: The new triangular wind corridor — is Southeast Europe becoming Europe’s next Iberia?

For years, the Iberian Peninsula defined what a wind powerhouse looked like inside Europe: strong resource, open land, grid-ready corridors, competitive auctions, and the steady inflow of international capital. Investors seeking scale, yield, and policy clarity migrated naturally towards...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!