Weekly energy market overview:...

During the second week of December, Brent oil futures for the Front Month...

European electricity prices: Weekly...

In the second week of December, average electricity prices fell in most major...

European electricity demand trends:...

During the week of December 8, electricity demand decreased across major European markets...

Europe: Solar and wind...

During the week of December 8, solar photovoltaic (PV) energy production increased in...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsBosnia and Herzegovina:...

Bosnia and Herzegovina: Energy community labelled small hydro-power plants as harmful

The decision of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FBiH) to ban the construction of small hydropower plants (SHPP) was welcomed by director of the Energy Community (EnC) Secretariat Janez Kopac, however, Kopac assessed that the implementation of this decision could prove problematic because the issuing of new licenses is the responsibility of local and cantonal governments. Also, it is not specified what will happen with the projects that are currently under development.

Prior to such a decision, the FBiH Parliament had to make a decision that would ban subsidizing the construction of SHPPs, because that would have a far greater effect. The biggest problem for SHPPs is that they are highly subsidized. There is no great economic benefit from them, but of course these subsidies encourage investors to build as much as possible. Therefore, this subsidy system should be abolished immediately. This cannot be done for the existing SHPPs, because the contracts should be respected. But by banning any subsidies, this problem might be solved on its own – if there are no subsidies for the construction of SHPPs, then the interest in their construction would be far less.

He emphasized that the construction of SHPPs significantly changes the ecological balance, but through a quality environmental assessment study it is necessary to establish which measures can mitigate those harmful effects. If the assessment is well made and if such measures are implemented in practice, then the environmental impact is acceptable. But the problem in BiH is that these environmental impact assessments have in many cases been very poorly done and that the measures envisaged there have not always been implemented in practice.

Kopac noted that the aggressive approach to the construction of SHPP is evident throughout western Balkan countries like BiH and Serbia, but hailed the examples of Albania and Montenegro where there are no new investments in this field.

Last month, FBiH Parliament banned the construction of new small hydropower plants, but similar decision did not pass in the Parliament of the other BiH entity – the Republic of Srpska.

 

 

 

 

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Weekly energy market overview: Brent Oil, TTF gas, and COâ‚‚ futures

During the second week of December, Brent oil futures for the Front Month on the ICE market reached their weekly maximum settlement price of $62.49/bbl on Monday, December 8, already 2.0% lower than the last session of the previous...

European electricity prices: Weekly trends and forecast

In the second week of December, average electricity prices fell in most major European markets compared to the previous week. The notable exception was the MIBEL market of Spain and Portugal, which recorded a 27% increase. Among the declines,...

European electricity demand trends: Weekly overview

During the week of December 8, electricity demand decreased across major European markets compared to the previous week, reversing the upward trend observed earlier. France recorded the steepest decline at 8.8%, marking the third consecutive week of falling demand....
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!