Why OE-governed quality assurance...

In every mature renewable market, there comes a moment when engineering quality—once assumed,...

Insurance, force majeure and...

In the early stages of Southeast Europe’s renewable expansion, wind investors focused primarily...

ESG, community strategy and...

For years, wind investment strategies in Southeast Europe focused almost exclusively on technical...

The grid-ready wind farm...

A decade ago, the success of a wind farm in Southeast Europe was...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsMontenegro: Dispute settlement...

Montenegro: Dispute settlement procedure over TPP Pljevlja

Montenegrin sole thermal power plant Pljevlja, continues to operate despite the expiry of the limited lifetime derogation period of the plant. The Energy Community Secretariat sent an Opening Letter to Montenegro to address its breach of the Large Combustion Plants Directive.

Following a written declaration not to operate a plant for more than 20,000 hours after 1 January 2018, the limited lifetime derogation (also known as opt-out) was granted to selected installations by the Energy Community Ministerial Council. It is an implementation alternative to complying with the maximum emission limits set by the Large Combustion Plants Directive. Following the expiry of the 20,000 hours, the plants can only remain in operation if they meet the (stricter) standards of the Industrial Emissions Directive. This is not the case for TPP Pljevlja. The approaching end of TPP Pljevlja’s opt-out period was continuously flagged by the Secretariat, including in its 2019 and 2020 Annual Implementation Reports. Finally, it was confirmed by the annual report under the Large Combustion Plants Directive submitted by Montenegro in March 2021.

 

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Why OE-governed quality assurance is becoming the new currency of wind asset value in Southeast Europe

In every mature renewable market, there comes a moment when engineering quality—once assumed, often overlooked—becomes the defining currency of asset value. Southeast Europe is entering that moment now. Serbia, Romania, Croatia, and Montenegro are witnessing a scale-up in wind...

Insurance, force majeure and financial risk transfer — the new architecture of protection for wind investors in Southeast Europe

In the early stages of Southeast Europe’s renewable expansion, wind investors focused primarily on EPC contracts, turbine warranties, and revenue support mechanisms. Insurance was treated as a formal requirement—necessary for lenders, but rarely integrated into strategic project design. That...

ESG, community strategy and social license — the hidden financial drivers of wind success in Southeast Europe

For years, wind investment strategies in Southeast Europe focused almost exclusively on technical variables: resource quality, EPC pricing, grid access, and financing structure. But as markets mature, a new set of forces is emerging—less visible than capex or P50...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!