Why OE-governed quality assurance...

In every mature renewable market, there comes a moment when engineering quality—once assumed,...

Insurance, force majeure and...

In the early stages of Southeast Europe’s renewable expansion, wind investors focused primarily...

ESG, community strategy and...

For years, wind investment strategies in Southeast Europe focused almost exclusively on technical...

The grid-ready wind farm...

A decade ago, the success of a wind farm in Southeast Europe was...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsBulgaria and US...

Bulgaria and US strategic partners in energy field important for diversification in the region

Bulgaria and the United States are strategic partners in the field of energy and that is a key factor for the diversification of energy suppliers not only in Bulgaria but also in the entire region, said Minister of Energy Temenuzhka Petkova, at a meeting with US Department of State’s Bureau of Energy Resources Assistant Secretary Francis R. Fannon.

Minister Petkova said that Bulgaria is actively working on guaranteeing energy security and values highly the United States’ support for the implementation of the priority infrastructure projects in this field: the Gas Interconnector Greece-Bulgaria (IGB) and the liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal near Alexandroupoli. According to Petkova, IGB project is a key priority of the Government in the energy sector, confirming the Government’s strong commitment to the successful construction of the interconnector as infrastructure of strategic importance to the security of gas supplies in Southeast Europe. Bulgaria views the construction of the IGB pipeline in synergy with the participation in the Alexandroupoli LNG terminal project. By participating in these projects, Bulgaria is achieving actual diversification of the gas sources and supply routes, and is becoming a key factor in this process in the region. Minister Petkova and Fannon also discussed the progress achieved in the project for diversifying the fresh nuclear fuel for nuclear power plant Kozloduy power plant. According to Bulgarian media, Fannon said after the meeting that the US considers the NPP Belene project bad from a commercial and technical point of view, and incapable of ensuring Bulgaria’s energy security. According to him, the Russian equipment for NPP Belene is technologically outdated and Russia refuses to use it on its own territory. Asked whether the US sanctions against the TurkStream gas pipeline project would also apply to the Balkan Stream project, Fannon said that regardless of the difference in the names of the projects, the US views Balkan Stream and TurkStream as one and the same pipeline. He specified that the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act directed against TurkStream does not oblige the US to impose sanctions but to use various means to ensure the Act’s implementation.

 

 

 

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Why OE-governed quality assurance is becoming the new currency of wind asset value in Southeast Europe

In every mature renewable market, there comes a moment when engineering quality—once assumed, often overlooked—becomes the defining currency of asset value. Southeast Europe is entering that moment now. Serbia, Romania, Croatia, and Montenegro are witnessing a scale-up in wind...

Insurance, force majeure and financial risk transfer — the new architecture of protection for wind investors in Southeast Europe

In the early stages of Southeast Europe’s renewable expansion, wind investors focused primarily on EPC contracts, turbine warranties, and revenue support mechanisms. Insurance was treated as a formal requirement—necessary for lenders, but rarely integrated into strategic project design. That...

ESG, community strategy and social license — the hidden financial drivers of wind success in Southeast Europe

For years, wind investment strategies in Southeast Europe focused almost exclusively on technical variables: resource quality, EPC pricing, grid access, and financing structure. But as markets mature, a new set of forces is emerging—less visible than capex or P50...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!