The Balkan grid at...

As winter settles across South-East Europe, the region’s electricity landscape enters a season...

The Balkan power mosaic:...

The final month of 2025 finds the electricity markets of South-East Europe entering...

Winter markets at the...

The western edge of the Balkan electricity system enters December 2025 with a...

Winter prices without the...

December 2025 opens the winter season in Central and South-East Europe with a...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeNews Serbia EnergySerbia, Who will...

Serbia, Who will take the wheel and drive EPS to a “better tomorrow”

The time has come for changes and reforms in the energy sector. The oft-repeated sentence could really become a reality soon. The Government of Serbia has consulted with world experts and now it only remains to be seen who will take over the “wheel” and drive, let’s say EPS, to a “better tomorrow”? More and more often it is heard that foreigners will do that too, when they were already consultants, but the question arises – is foreign really the best?

It has been a logical, common knowledge thing for years – energy, public companies need professional management, which is impossible to get. Even the current government announced it loudly a decade ago. And nothing. But here it is, arriving at the Electric Power Company of Serbia, they announce again.

“It’s always been, sometimes party bullshit, sometimes the bullshit of insufficiently capable people, sometimes the bullshit of people who couldn’t know it all and great – at least we admitted to ourselves that we don’t know, and we know who does,” said Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić .

The one who knows was found in Norway, because apparently there are none in Serbia. Or is there?

“I know several of them personally, primarily because of their expertise and because they would not listen to what they are told from political circles, therefore, they would not be subject to political pressure,” believes energy expert Miodrag Kapor.

However, the decision-makers seem to have not heard of those “resilient” that Kapor knows. But they did for the consulting company “Rystad Energy”, so they chose it as a partner in the reform process.

However, whether that company will choose professional management and whether and when the current leadership in public companies will be replaced by foreigners, there is no official confirmation for now. One can only guess.

“I think that “Rejstad” or “Rajstad”, whatever you want, is today the best house in the whole world for analyzing the energy situation, for taking measures…” said Vučić.

The fact that a foreigner is at the head of the company is not a guarantee that it will be successful, but what matters is whether that person will have free hands to build his team and fulfill the plan, according to economic analyst Jelica Putniković.

“And that he has responsibility, if he doesn’t fulfill it.” And I think that it is a much better option for them to be local experts, because they know the economic and energy situation in Serbia, and yet, people who would come from abroad, they would need a lot of time to learn all that,” says Putniković.

According to Putniković’s unofficial information, the Norwegians are aware of this, so they invited many of our experts from the country or the “white world” to the delegation for cooperation with Serbia as consultants – subcontractors.

“Which means that Serbia has energy experts and they could come and help, so to speak, the energy industry to rise to a higher level and to complete the energy transition that has been going on for the third decade in our country,” added Putniković.

Examples from the past remind us that the epithet “100 percent foreign” does not automatically mean “100 percent success.”

“Let me remind the viewers, we already had a situation with the ironworks in Smederevo, where we had so-called professional management from another country, so they left huge losses. “I wouldn’t like it to happen now, but I don’t see any reason why something like that shouldn’t happen again,” assesses Kapor.

Foreigners or not, in Kapor’s opinion, the most important thing is that the management has a motive to run the company successfully, as well as the transparency of the selection in the competition, instead of the previous direct, political bargain with a company, so that we know who is really the best choice, he notes, N1 writes.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Serbia’s energy dilemma: EPS faces a slow-burning crisis amid calls for accountability

For decades, Serbia’s national utility, Elektroprivreda Srbije (EPS), operated under the illusion of indestructibility. Its sprawling lignite mines, ageing thermal plants and hydropower dams formed the backbone of a system that appeared resistant to regional shocks, political storms and...

Serbia’s energy future at stake in post-Russia gas power struggle

For more than two decades, Serbia’s political and economic stability rested on a simple, unwritten assumption: Russian gas would continue to flow, reliably, predictably and at preferential terms negotiated quietly between Belgrade and Moscow. The relationship was never merely...

Sanctions on NIS trigger Serbia’s most severe financial stress test in a generation

When the United States expanded its sanctions targeting Russian energy interests, few policymakers in Belgrade initially grasped the magnitude of what was unfolding. On the surface, nothing had changed: Serbia’s biggest oil company, NIS, majority-owned by Gazprom Neft, continued...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!