Financing wind in Montenegro,...

The landscape of renewable finance in Southeast Europe has undergone a profound transformation....

How Southeast Europe’s grid...

Wind development in Southeast Europe is accelerating at a pace unimaginable only a...

Serbia–Romania–Croatia: The new triangular...

For years, the Iberian Peninsula defined what a wind powerhouse looked like inside...

The bankability gap in...

The transformation of Southeast Europe into a credible wind-investment region has been rapid,...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeNews Serbia EnergySerbia, State-owned power...

Serbia, State-owned power utility EPS recorded a net loss in the amount of almost 630 million euros in 2022

Serbian state-owned power utility EPS recorded a net loss in the amount of almost 630 million euros in 2022, which is significantly lower than the planned 830 million euros loss of for the year.

At the end of the third quarter of 2022, EPS had a negative financial result of almost 680 million euros, but it achieved a positive result of 50 million euros in the fourth quarter of the year. The better-than-planned financial result is the result of less electricity imports than planned and the drop in electricity prices on the market.

In 2022, EPS revenues in the amount of 3.1 billion euros, of which 3 billion were revenues from the sale of electricity. On the other hand, expenses amounted to 3.58 billion euros, of which around one billion euros was spent on electricity imports.

EPS generated a total of 31,127 GWh of electricity in 2022, which is 2 % less than planned and 8 % less compared to 2021. The reasons for such a result are the large and long-lasting drought in the Danube and Drina basins, and the lack of available coal from the Kolubara mining basin.

Hydro generation in 2022 was 1 % less than planned and 23 % less compared to 2021. Total electricity generation from renewable energy sources amounted to 8 TWh, which is 59 % less than planned.

Coal-fired electricity generation amounted to 22,167 GWh, which is 3 % less than planned and roughly on the level with the generation in 2021.

Coal was dominant in EPS’ generation mix with 68.8 % share, hydropower plants contributed with 28.7 %, gas-fired cogeneration plants with 2.4 %, while 0.1 % of EPS’ generation came from renewable sources other than hydro.

In 2022, EPS delivered a total of 36,060 GWh of electricity to the system, which is 2 % less than planned and 3 % less than in 2021. 4,932 GWh of electricity was sourced externally, 2,040 GWh from traders and 1,622 GWh from eligible RES producers.

EPS imported 3,278 GWh of electricity in 2022 at the average price of 248.7 euros/MWh, while electricity it exported was sold at the average price of 71.5 euros/MWh.

Total financial debt at the end of 2022 amounted to 1.42 billion euros, which is some 160 million euros more compared to the end of 2021.

Sign up for updates & special reports

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Financing wind in Montenegro, Serbia, Croatia and Romania — why international lenders are returning to Southeast Europe

The landscape of renewable finance in Southeast Europe has undergone a profound transformation. A decade ago, lenders viewed the region with a degree of caution, shaped by fluctuating regulatory frameworks, limited track records, and the perceived fragility of local...

Serbia–Romania–Croatia: The new triangular wind corridor — is Southeast Europe becoming Europe’s next Iberia?

For years, the Iberian Peninsula defined what a wind powerhouse looked like inside Europe: strong resource, open land, grid-ready corridors, competitive auctions, and the steady inflow of international capital. Investors seeking scale, yield, and policy clarity migrated naturally towards...

Regional gas geopolitics: Hungary, Bulgaria, Romania, and Serbia in the new European gas map

The transformation of Europe’s gas landscape is redrawing the political and commercial map of Southeast Europe. In the span of just a few years, the region has shifted from a single-supplier, pipeline-dominated system to a multi-entry, LNG-influenced, competition-driven gas...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!