Financing wind in Montenegro,...

The landscape of renewable finance in Southeast Europe has undergone a profound transformation....

How Southeast Europe’s grid...

Wind development in Southeast Europe is accelerating at a pace unimaginable only a...

Serbia–Romania–Croatia: The new triangular...

For years, the Iberian Peninsula defined what a wind powerhouse looked like inside...

The bankability gap in...

The transformation of Southeast Europe into a credible wind-investment region has been rapid,...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsSerbia needs between...

Serbia needs between 16 and 33 billion euros in investments in the energy sector in the next 15 to 20 years

Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic said after the conference Possibilities of Investments in Renewable Energy Sources in the Western Balkans that, according to Norwegian experts, Serbia needs between 16 and 33 billion euros in investments in the energy sector in the next 15 to 20 years.

President Vucic said that it is not just about the diversification of gas and oil supply, but also the fact that there is an old-fashioned approach, old technologies in thermal power plants, and there is nothing new in hydro potentials either. Serbia is still not in the position to increase the percentage of renewable energy sources in the total consumption.

According to him, the Government prepared the budget for 2023 with the International Monetary Fund and a deficit of 3.3 – 3.4 % of the gross domestic product (GDP) is projected, which is relatively good, but nearly 45 % of it goes for expenditures for the supply of energy resources. He added that Serbia is currently spending about 2.5 million euros per day on electricity imports alone.

He said that Serbia urgently needs investments in new renewable energy capacities, but also in modernization of existing thermal and hydro capacities, adding that, in the future, energy prices could no longer serve as a social category.

In mid-October, media reported that the Government has signed the confidential agreement with Norwegian company Rystad Energy on advisory services. The agreement allegedly stipulates that Rystad Energy should define the problems in Serbian energy sector and propose three possible scenarios: a quick transition (strong investments in new energy technologies), a slow transition (a higher reliance on the existing energy, lower investments in new energy technologies) and the third option – the use of nuclear technology.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Financing wind in Montenegro, Serbia, Croatia and Romania — why international lenders are returning to Southeast Europe

The landscape of renewable finance in Southeast Europe has undergone a profound transformation. A decade ago, lenders viewed the region with a degree of caution, shaped by fluctuating regulatory frameworks, limited track records, and the perceived fragility of local...

How Southeast Europe’s grid bottlenecks will reshape project valuation, offtake strategy and EPC designs by 2030

Wind development in Southeast Europe is accelerating at a pace unimaginable only a decade ago, yet the region’s grid infrastructure is straining under the weight of its own renewable ambition. Serbia is preparing for multi-gigawatt expansion, Romania is restarting...

Serbia–Romania–Croatia: The new triangular wind corridor — is Southeast Europe becoming Europe’s next Iberia?

For years, the Iberian Peninsula defined what a wind powerhouse looked like inside Europe: strong resource, open land, grid-ready corridors, competitive auctions, and the steady inflow of international capital. Investors seeking scale, yield, and policy clarity migrated naturally towards...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!