2030–2035 scenario annex: Gas...

Scenario one: High volatility, tight LNG markets In a scenario characterised by global LNG...

What the European gas...

The European natural gas market has moved decisively away from its pre-2020 equilibrium....

Policy without borders: How...

Electricity market coupling is often discussed in technical or commercial terms, but its...

Fragmented convergence: Why Southeast...

For much of the past decade, the dominant assumption shaping policy and market...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeUncategorizedSerbia: EPS swings...

Serbia: EPS swings to record profit in 2023

The Serbian state-owned power utilityElektroprivreda Srbije (EPS), marked a historic financial result last year, boasting a profit of 114.6 billion dinars, equivalent to around 980 million euros. This significant turnaround has been emphasized by Dubravka Đedović Handanović, the Minister of Energy and Mining. Notably, EPS had concluded the year 2022 with a loss of 73.7 billion dinars (approximately 630 million euros) and had experienced losses in the preceding years as well.

The remarkable transformation in EPS’s financial performance within just one year has drawn attention. Experts attribute this success to several key factors. Firstly, the increased electricity prices for both consumers and businesses, along with substantial electricity exports at high prices, significantly contributed to EPS’s profitability. Favorable hydrological conditions also played a crucial role, leading to abundant production from hydroelectric power plants, although such conditions are not consistent annually.

According to data from the Republic Institute of Statistics (RZS), Serbia exported electrical energy worth 1.274 billion euros in the previous year, reflecting the substantial revenues from international sales. Željko Marković, a specialist from the company “Sitek,” highlighted the dominance of two factors in EPS’s high profitability during the past year.

“Firstly, the high electricity prices, resulting from the energy crisis, ranged from 150 to 180 euros per megawatt-hour for long-term deliveries, depending on the type of product. Secondly, the exceptionally favorable hydrological situation enabled EPS to achieve sufficient production, both for the domestic market and for sale in neighboring markets,” explained Marković.

Milojko Arsić, a professor at the Faculty of Economics in Belgrade, emphasized that the increased profitability of EPS is attributable to various factors, including higher electricity prices and increased production from hydroelectric plants, which incur lower costs for the company. Additionally, reduced domestic consumption due to a mild winter also contributed to the improved financial performance.

It is essential to analyze the profitability of coal production, considering that Serbia imported coal last year. Arsić suggests assessing the profitability of coal-based production to gain insights into its impact on EPS’s overall financial performance.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

2030–2035 scenario annex: Gas prices, CBAM and export margins

Scenario one: High volatility, tight LNG markets In a scenario characterised by global LNG tightness, regulatory uncertainty, and persistent geopolitical risk, European gas prices remain volatile with frequent spikes. Average prices may moderate, but extreme events become more common. Under this...

Gas–power flexibility models for Serbian industries

Flexibility as a cost-control mechanism Flexibility has become the primary tool for managing gas-driven volatility. In the Serbian context, flexibility does not mean eliminating gas use but managing when and how gas and electricity are consumed. At the system level, flexibility...

Gas vs electricity procurement: Strategic choices fo Serbian exporters

Serbian exporters increasingly face a strategic choice: treat gas and electricity as separate procurement streams or integrate them into a unified energy risk strategy. The latter approach is rapidly becoming essential. Gas procurement indexed fully to TTF offers flexibility but...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!