2030–2035 scenario annex: Gas...

Scenario one: High volatility, tight LNG markets In a scenario characterised by global LNG...

What the European gas...

The European natural gas market has moved decisively away from its pre-2020 equilibrium....

Policy without borders: How...

Electricity market coupling is often discussed in technical or commercial terms, but its...

Fragmented convergence: Why Southeast...

For much of the past decade, the dominant assumption shaping policy and market...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeNews Serbia EnergySerbia, EPS recorded...

Serbia, EPS recorded a net loss in the amount of 678 million euros in the first nine months of 2022

Serbian state-owned power utility EPS recorded a net loss in the amount of 678 million euros in the first nine months of 2022, compared to a profit of some 72 million euros in the same period last year .

The company’s revenues increased by 19.4 % in the first nine months of the year, reaching a total of 2.21 billion euros, but its expenditures rose by 60.7 % in the same period to 2.72 billion euros.

In the first nine months of 2022, EPS produced a total of 25.5 TWh of electricity, which is 12 % less compared to the same period in 2021. Hydropower plants generated 6.7 TWh of electricity, while the generation of coal-fired power plants amounted to 15.8 TWh.

EPS recorded a loss of 418 million euros in the first half of 2022. The main reason for such huge losses is decreased electricity generation and subsequent imports at extremely high prices. EPS also started importing coal, mostly from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro, for which it spent around 9.5 million euros in the first half of 2022. However, by far most costly item is imported electricity – in H1 2022 EPS imported 2,356 GWh of electricity at the average price of 222 euros/MWh, which amounts to more than 520 million euros. The loss due to bad management and untimely mining of coal is measured not only by the cost of importing expensive electricity due to the lack of own production, but also by the lost profit that it would have had if it had exported electricity at such high prices on the foreign markets.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

2030–2035 scenario annex: Gas prices, CBAM and export margins

Scenario one: High volatility, tight LNG markets In a scenario characterised by global LNG tightness, regulatory uncertainty, and persistent geopolitical risk, European gas prices remain volatile with frequent spikes. Average prices may moderate, but extreme events become more common. Under this...

Gas–power flexibility models for Serbian industries

Flexibility as a cost-control mechanism Flexibility has become the primary tool for managing gas-driven volatility. In the Serbian context, flexibility does not mean eliminating gas use but managing when and how gas and electricity are consumed. At the system level, flexibility...

Gas vs electricity procurement: Strategic choices fo Serbian exporters

Serbian exporters increasingly face a strategic choice: treat gas and electricity as separate procurement streams or integrate them into a unified energy risk strategy. The latter approach is rapidly becoming essential. Gas procurement indexed fully to TTF offers flexibility but...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!