Financing wind in Montenegro,...

The landscape of renewable finance in Southeast Europe has undergone a profound transformation....

How Southeast Europe’s grid...

Wind development in Southeast Europe is accelerating at a pace unimaginable only a...

Serbia–Romania–Croatia: The new triangular...

For years, the Iberian Peninsula defined what a wind powerhouse looked like inside...

The bankability gap in...

The transformation of Southeast Europe into a credible wind-investment region has been rapid,...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeNews Serbia EnergySerbia: EPS is...

Serbia: EPS is hiding whether it considered transferring 11 HPP to a joint venture with MVM


“EPS AD, a capital company owned by the state, is illegally denying the public important information about its work and the possible disposal of assets of great value,” the Transparency Serbia organization announced today.

According to them, Transparency Serbia, since May 26th, 2023, has been trying to verify with the Elektroprivreda Srbije the allegations presented in the media, according to which EPS was considering a proposal for the formation of a joint company with “MVM Group“ from Hungary on the formation of a joint company to which it would be transferred 11 hydroelectric power plants.

It was only after the fourth appeal that we received a reply that these data were unavailable because providing the information “would make it difficult to achieve justified economic interests between the two countries” and that the requested documents were business secrets “because they were marked as such by the author of the document”.

At first glance, it is clear that EPS AD’s decision is illegal because the request was rejected on all ten points, although no business correspondence between EPS and the Hungarian company, nor trade secrets of that company, were requested at all.

Thus, EPS treats the following as a “business secret”: whether it has the proposal and the adopted agenda of the meetings of the supervisory boards held in 2023, whether the Hungarian company’s proposal was an item on the agenda at the meetings; whether there are minutes from the meetings of the supervisory board; whether the offer was decided at the sessions; which EPS service or external consultants analyzed the submitted offer and prepared “Information” about it for the Supervisory Board; on what date EPS received the offer; with which state bodies did EPS consult or obtain opinions in connection with this offer and the like”, stated in the statement of TS.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Financing wind in Montenegro, Serbia, Croatia and Romania — why international lenders are returning to Southeast Europe

The landscape of renewable finance in Southeast Europe has undergone a profound transformation. A decade ago, lenders viewed the region with a degree of caution, shaped by fluctuating regulatory frameworks, limited track records, and the perceived fragility of local...

How Southeast Europe’s grid bottlenecks will reshape project valuation, offtake strategy and EPC designs by 2030

Wind development in Southeast Europe is accelerating at a pace unimaginable only a decade ago, yet the region’s grid infrastructure is straining under the weight of its own renewable ambition. Serbia is preparing for multi-gigawatt expansion, Romania is restarting...

Serbia–Romania–Croatia: The new triangular wind corridor — is Southeast Europe becoming Europe’s next Iberia?

For years, the Iberian Peninsula defined what a wind powerhouse looked like inside Europe: strong resource, open land, grid-ready corridors, competitive auctions, and the steady inflow of international capital. Investors seeking scale, yield, and policy clarity migrated naturally towards...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!