Romania: End of price...

Electricity bills for July and part of August 2025 in Romania are significantly...

Bosnia and Herzegovina sees...

According to the Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), gross electricity...

Albania: Electricity production falls...

According to data from the Albanian Institute of Statistics (INSTAT), electricity production in...

Romania: Energy Vault partners...

Swiss energy storage company Energy Vault has signed an agreement to provide up...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeNews Serbia EnergySerbia: EPS is...

Serbia: EPS is hiding whether it considered transferring 11 HPP to a joint venture with MVM


“EPS AD, a capital company owned by the state, is illegally denying the public important information about its work and the possible disposal of assets of great value,” the Transparency Serbia organization announced today.

According to them, Transparency Serbia, since May 26th, 2023, has been trying to verify with the Elektroprivreda Srbije the allegations presented in the media, according to which EPS was considering a proposal for the formation of a joint company with “MVM Group“ from Hungary on the formation of a joint company to which it would be transferred 11 hydroelectric power plants.

It was only after the fourth appeal that we received a reply that these data were unavailable because providing the information “would make it difficult to achieve justified economic interests between the two countries” and that the requested documents were business secrets “because they were marked as such by the author of the document”.

At first glance, it is clear that EPS AD’s decision is illegal because the request was rejected on all ten points, although no business correspondence between EPS and the Hungarian company, nor trade secrets of that company, were requested at all.

Thus, EPS treats the following as a “business secret”: whether it has the proposal and the adopted agenda of the meetings of the supervisory boards held in 2023, whether the Hungarian company’s proposal was an item on the agenda at the meetings; whether there are minutes from the meetings of the supervisory board; whether the offer was decided at the sessions; which EPS service or external consultants analyzed the submitted offer and prepared “Information” about it for the Supervisory Board; on what date EPS received the offer; with which state bodies did EPS consult or obtain opinions in connection with this offer and the like”, stated in the statement of TS.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Slovenia: Wind Energy Association calls for balanced policy consultation

The Slovenian Wind Energy Association (GIZ) has expressed concern that recent political debates on wind energy are being shaped by what it views as an unbalanced event. The association says conclusions from a June consultation in the National Council—attended...

Serbia: US extends sanctions deadline for NIS until late September

The US Department of the Treasury has once again delayed the enforcement of sanctions on Serbian oil company NIS, marking the sixth extension of the deadline. According to the Serbian Government, the new date for the possible implementation is...

Romania: End of price caps and VAT hike drive sharp rise in electricity bills

Electricity bills for July and part of August 2025 in Romania are significantly higher than in previous months, driven by multiple factors. A heatwave increased consumption as air conditioners and cooling devices were used extensively. At the same time,...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!