Europe: Geopolitical tensions drive...

Rising geopolitical tensions significantly impacted global gas prices, with European gas futures reaching...

Electricity market trends in...

In Week 46 of 2024, electricity prices in Southeast Europe (SEE) surged compared...

Slovenia: Krško nuclear power...

In October 2024, the Krško nuclear power plant, jointly owned by Slovenia and...

Romania: CCE Holding launches...

Last week, CCE Holding commissioned its largest solar power plant in Europe to...
Supported byClarion Energy banner
HomeUncategorizedSEE region: What...

SEE region: What is behind the price jump on the electricity exchanges

Record high temperatures across Southeast Europe, reaching 40 degrees Celsius for several days in a row, bolstered the consumption of electricity. But according to experts, it isn’t the main cause of the so far unseen price increase on power exchanges, by 50% to 170%. Some of the main factors are the reduction of transmission capacities between Hungary and the rest of the European Union, with Serbia as well, and between Bulgaria and Romania. There is the delay in the return of the Kozloduy nuclear plant to full operation, too, together with the reduction in output from coal-fired power plants, and Ukraine’s switch from being an exporter to an importer.

The highest price jump was registered on the Hungarian power exchange, HUPX, for deliveries between 20:00 and 23:00. The level reached an astonishing EUR 940 per MWh, compared to around EUR 350 from the previous week. The average price on the day-ahead market (DAM) so far this week is EUR 200 per MWh, compared to EUR 120 per MWh in the previous seven-day period. Such high levels have been unseen since 2022, during the energy crisis.

Romania’s OPCOM had the maximum hourly DAM prices reaching EUR 700 per MWh, doubling from the week before. The Bulgarian IBEX hit EUR 500 per MWh, after EUR 365 per MWh in the previous equivalent period. The wave quickly hit Greece, Croatia, and Serbia.

In Croatia, the CROPEX benchmark showed EUR 390 per MWh, while at Serbia’s SEEPEX the level exceeded EUR 400 per MWh. Last week the maximum price was EUR 125 per MWh. There is little possibility of a letdown because the heatwave is forecasted to continue and the factors propping up prices aren’t about to change.

Kosorić: Many factors driving price surge – some are obvious, others not

Marko Kosorić, SEE Energy Business Expert at Balkan Energy AG, says that the analysis demonstrated that the price spike is a consequence of many factors, of which some are obvious and others aren’t.

“Even though most of the markets registered extreme prices, the one in Hungary surprised the most. High prices can only partially be explained by a rise in imports amid the heatwave,” he told Balkan Green Energy News.

According to him, the heatwave between July 8 and 10 is comparable to the one of July 27 to 30, 2021, when temperatures were similar.

“It is true that the average price on HUPX was extremely high, but mostly because of just two hours, 20 hours and 21 hours. Did those hours cause stress, given the size of imports into Hungary alone? The electricity imports into Hungary in 20h and 21h were not higher than during the heatwave of July 2021. Therefore, the Hungarian market doesn’t import more than before, but the prices are much higher than in similar conditions during the 2021 heatwave,” Kosorić stressed.

The analysis shows consumption in Southeast Europe – Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Greece, Hungary, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia and Slovenia – isn’t much higher now than during the heatwave of July 2021. The spread doesn’t exceed 800 MW in the hours from 20h to 24h.

In both cases, the region imported power from Central-Western Europe via the Austrian-Slovenian, Austrian-Hungarian, Slovakian-Hungarian and Italian-SEE borders.

However, he explains, the total import which the grid was able to sustain in hours from 20h to 24h was 800 MW lower in 2024 than in 2021.

“This shows that the effective grid capacity from Central-Western Europe was lower than it was in 2021 and this was the most unexpected factor which happened as of July 8 fueling extreme HUPX prices,” Kosorić says, and adds that the total import of the SEE region wasn’t much higher than it was during the heat wave of July 2021 – 4,400 MW.

Flow-based market coupling is a key

According to the analysis, Flow-Based Market Coupling (FBCM) is “forcing” the Hungarian bidding zone to produce more energy by giving HUPX a higher price, however, it cannot produce more irrespectively to the HUPX price. FBMC doesn’t let the Hungarian market to import more in the welfare optimization, Kosorić said.

The analysis showed there is plenty of grid capacity from Croatia and Slovenia to Hungary, but that such transactions would increase Hungarian imports, which would not be favourable for the welfare optimization. Namely, traders cannot nominate energy anymore from the Croatian to the Hungarian market, so the prices on the two markets cannot be equalized as in the net transmission capacity (NTC) coupling mechanism.

Data show that maximal FBMC bilateral flows from Europe to Hungary were greatly reduced after July 8, by 1,200 MW to 1,300 MW, in the riskiest hours from 19h to 24h.

Kosorić expressed the belief that the only way to boost power flows to the Hungarian market bypassing the FCBM mechanism is via the Serbian-Hungarian border, but the link NTC was slashed from 800 MW to 200 MW.

The other options are increasing the FBMC capacity, though Kosorić points out that there is no timeline for it, and cutting exports to Ukraine from Hungary and Romania.

Transmission grid constraints in the region were also higher this year than in 2021 and the grid capacity was more limited. The maximum Bulgaria-Romania cross-border capacity was weakened to 1,200 MW from 1,700 MW due to maintenance, scheduled until July 22. Therefore Romanian market has to be supplied from the Hungarian market but, as Kosorić put it, in a very non-intuitive way.

FBMC enables much lower prices on OPCOM than on HUPX

From 18h to 24h, all available selling offers on the Romanian market were taken and the only solution within FBMC was to nominate a high commercial flow from Hungary to Romania.

However, it was nominated in a highly counterintuitive manner as FBMC enables much lower prices on OPCOM than on HUPX, sometimes by as much as EUR 250 per MWh, while delivering energy from HUPX to OPCOM, according to Kosorić.

In his view, FBMC sometimes results in non-intuitive flows, resulting from the coupling of markets in the direction of bidding zones with higher to ones with lower prices. Such flows, Kosorić said, usually occur when the loss of economic welfare resulting from the non-intuitive flow is smaller than the economic welfare gain of congestion relieving, adds.

Since the Romanian bidding zone is not connected to any other core region bidding zone but the Hungarian one and congestion are not relieved with flow from Hungary to Romania since congestion is not in this direction, the reason for such non-intuitive solutions is probably a complete absence of any available offer on Romanian market.

The non-intuitive Hungary-Romania flow is most probably not a consequence of economic welfare optimization against the welfare gain which would come from the congestion relief, Kosorić explains.

Grid capacity isn’t the only issue

The issues are not limited to the transmission grid. According to the analysis, the high prices achieved at all the power exchanges could be caused by multiple factors.

Interestingly, imports in the region were the same as in the heatwave of 2021, but many other parameters are different. It imported electricity at 700 MW from Ukraine, but now it is exporting at 800 MW to Ukraine and Moldova.

There is now much less cheap electricity in the region from coal plants

Kosorić noted that coal power plant capacity in the region has dropped by 2,000 MW, cutting the availability of cheap electricity in the riskiest hours. The return of a 1,000 MW reactor in the Kozloduy nuclear power plant to the grid was delayed by three weeks. The synchronization began on July 8 and the unit reached full and stable production only on July 10 in the afternoon.

Kosorić concluded that current prices on HUPX in the hours 20h, 21h and 22h are a consequence of the grid’s inability to physically deliver additional energy to Hungarian and Romanian markets and that they are not related to real energy generation costs.

The current prices in the hours 20h, 21h and 22h on other markets in the region are also not a consequence of real production costs, but elevated offer prices, he says.

What to expect in the coming weeks

Kosorić doesn’t expect anything to change over the coming weeks.

“Next week will be even warmer than this one, with no other important structural changes, so the region will remain highly sensitive. Transmission grid limitations within the FBMC mechanism can get even stronger due to overhauls in Central European grids, while hydropower output is falling and solar power generation is at its maximum,” he says, Balkan Green Energy News reports.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Electricity market trends in Southeast Europe: Week 46, 2024

In Week 46 of 2024, electricity prices in Southeast Europe (SEE) surged compared to the previous week (Week 45). The increase in electricity demand across all SEE countries during the week of November 11 led to higher prices in...

Slovenia: Krško nuclear power plant exceeds October 2024 electricity production targets

In October 2024, the Krško nuclear power plant, jointly owned by Slovenia and Croatia, generated 520,450 MWh of net electricity, exceeding its planned output of 508,000 MWh by 2.45%. This marked a strong performance, especially considering that the plant...

Serbia: EPS faces rising procurement costs and declining profits amid energy challenges in 2024

Serbia’s state-owned power utility, EPS, spent approximately €370 million on electricity procurement in the first nine months of 2024, a significant increase from €213 million during the same period last year. The rise in procurement costs was driven by...
Supported bySEE Mining News
error: Content is protected !!