Europe: Gas prices slide...

In Week 30 of 2025, European gas prices declined, with Dutch TTF prices...

Region: Heatwave drives SEE...

In Week 30 of 2025, electricity market prices rose significantly across most Southeast...

Romania: INVL Renewable Energy...

INVL Renewable Energy Fund I, managed by INVL Asset Management and focused on...

Croatia: Summary of Guarantees...

On 29 July, a total of 231,827 Guarantees of Origin (GOs) were sold...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeUncategorizedSEE region: Moldova's...

SEE region: Moldova’s antitrust body fines OMV Petrom, Rompetrol, Lukoil with 25 million euros

Moldova’s competition body Consiliul Concurentei announced fines with a total value of 25 million euros in the case of six fuel retailers found to have coordinated the prices charged on the local car fuel retail market during the period investigated (March 2019 – January 2021). 

The decision can be appealed within 30 days.

The largest fines were decided in the cases of the major retailers Rompetrol (10 million euros), Lukoil (9.4 Rompetrol (10 million euros), and OMV Petrom (4 Rompetrol (10 million euros). Independent retailers Bemol (1.5 Rompetrol (10 million euros), Tirex (80,000 euros), and Datorio (50,000 euros) were also fined.

The six companies have denied any agreement and claimed their decisions were purely based on commercial strategy.

The competition body, however, concluded that “such conduct would have been impossible in the absence of an understanding between the competitors.”

The decision is somehow surprising, given that the car fuel prices are regulated in Moldova. Retail fuel prices in the Republic of Moldova are rather strictly controlled by the energy market regulator (ANRE), which sets maximum prices and maximum markups.

On July 1, for instance, ANRE set the maximal prices at MDL 25 per litre for petrol and MDL 21.77 per litre for diesel while at the same time hiking the markup allowed at 3.5%.

“ANRE continues to closely follow the developments at the international oil exchanges and assures consumers of the correctness of the daily calculation of the prices set for fuel,” the agency commented.

In a press release quoted by NewsMaker, OMV Petrom stated that it disagrees with the Competition Council’s conclusions and intends to appeal the fine in court. In addition, the company questioned the economic feasibility of doing business in Moldova.

The company stated that it strictly complies with legal requirements in the field of competition. 

“The company categorically rejects the conclusions of the antimonopoly authority and will apply to the competent court to protect its rights. For 20 years, Petrom Moldova has acted in good faith and has proven itself to be a reliable partner,” the company said in a statement. It also called the fine “unreasonable.” 

“In the conditions of a regulated market, the imposition of an unjustified and disproportionate fine calls into question the economic feasibility of doing business on the Moldovan market,” the company warned.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Serbia: US Treasury extends sanctions delay on NIS for fifth time

The US Treasury Department has postponed the activation of sanctions on Serbian oil company NIS for an additional 30 days, marking the fifth extension since January. Serbian Energy Minister Dubravka Djedović noted that securing a further, longer reprieve is currently...

Bosnia and Herzegovina: Bosanski Brod oil refinery reports €15.3 million net loss in first half of 2025

The financial report for the first half of 2025 shows that the Bosanski Brod oil refinery incurred a net loss of €15.3 million, increasing its total accumulated losses to approximately €467 million. During the first six months of 2025, turnover...

Europe: Fossil fuel and carbon markets show mixed signals amid supply shifts and economic uncertainty

Brent oil futures for the Front Month on the ICE market declined in most sessions during the fourth week of July, marking the second consecutive week of losses. The only exception was Thursday, July 24, when the settlement price...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!