Financing wind in Montenegro,...

The landscape of renewable finance in Southeast Europe has undergone a profound transformation....

How Southeast Europe’s grid...

Wind development in Southeast Europe is accelerating at a pace unimaginable only a...

Serbia–Romania–Croatia: The new triangular...

For years, the Iberian Peninsula defined what a wind powerhouse looked like inside...

The bankability gap in...

The transformation of Southeast Europe into a credible wind-investment region has been rapid,...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsRomania: Coal phase-out...

Romania: Coal phase-out plan by 2032 not good enough

According to Bankwatch Romania, the country’s planned coal phase-out by 2032 is not enough for Romania to be able to reach its climate targets and to really contribute to reducing the effects of global heating. Bankwatch states that studies show that in order to mitigate the effects of climate change, EU countries must give up coal by 2030, the latest. The European Union has committed itself to reducing greenhouse gases (GHGs) by at least 55 % by 2030, more than the initial target of 40 %. However, it is still not enough. Specialists show that globally GHGs should be reduced by at least 65 % by 2030 in order to reach zero net GHG emissions in 2050.

Hard coal represents only 2 % of Romania’s energy mix, the largest amount of emissions are attributed to lignite, which provides 17-20 % of electricity annually. In 2019, hard coal had emissions of 1.18 million tons of carbon dioxide, while those of lignite exceeded 12 million tons.

In addition, power plants which use hard coal have already been shut down for economic and environmental reasons. For example – TPP Mintia, which exceeds the limits for sulfur dioxide and particulate matter and cannot receive an integrated environmental permit, which is why Romania has been in the infringement procedure for four years.

According to Bankwatch, the decision and timetable for coal phase-out mentioned in the PNRR, as well as the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions must also be reflected in the Territorial Plans for a fair transition, in order to be able to propose projects and measures to mitigate the social impact. It is also necessary to set the date for the removal of lignite so that the fair transition in Gorj and Dolj regions can be planned in a coherent way.

 

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Financing wind in Montenegro, Serbia, Croatia and Romania — why international lenders are returning to Southeast Europe

The landscape of renewable finance in Southeast Europe has undergone a profound transformation. A decade ago, lenders viewed the region with a degree of caution, shaped by fluctuating regulatory frameworks, limited track records, and the perceived fragility of local...

How Southeast Europe’s grid bottlenecks will reshape project valuation, offtake strategy and EPC designs by 2030

Wind development in Southeast Europe is accelerating at a pace unimaginable only a decade ago, yet the region’s grid infrastructure is straining under the weight of its own renewable ambition. Serbia is preparing for multi-gigawatt expansion, Romania is restarting...

Serbia–Romania–Croatia: The new triangular wind corridor — is Southeast Europe becoming Europe’s next Iberia?

For years, the Iberian Peninsula defined what a wind powerhouse looked like inside Europe: strong resource, open land, grid-ready corridors, competitive auctions, and the steady inflow of international capital. Investors seeking scale, yield, and policy clarity migrated naturally towards...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!