Montenegro–Italy electricity market coupling:...

Electricity market coupling between Montenegro and Italy marks a structural break in the...

How SEE electricity spreads...

Serbia’s industrial competitiveness is increasingly shaped not by domestic conditions alone but by...

Regional power-flow shifts after...

The shutdown of Pljevlja transforms Montenegro’s internal energy balance, but its implications extend...

Private wind producers in...

Montenegro’s power system is undergoing a quiet reordering of influence. Where state hydro...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsRegion, Fossil Fuel...

Region, Fossil Fuel giants are shaping the EU’s response to the energy crisis

Lobby watchdog Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has obtained recent meeting documents from the European Commission (EC) that reveal that major fossil fuel companies are influencing the EU’s response to the energy crisis.

Minutes reveal that CEOs of six big energy companies – Shell, BP, Total, ENI, E.ON and Vattenfall – met President Von der Leyen and Energy Commissioner Simson the day they released their RePowerEU communiqué laying out the EU’s response to Ukraine. They agreed to set up an industry Task Force and determine which measures were “feasible”.

The meeting, which took place on 23 March, was the latest in a long line between the European Roundtable of Industry (ERT) and its CEO-level members with President Von der Leyen since the invasion of Ukraine.

In practice, this means the EU’s plans to get off Russian gas are being shaped by the very same companies that have kept the continent hooked on it until now. A fleshed-out version of RePowerEU is expected on 18 May with big energy CEOs pushing for it to lock the EU into decades more gas.

Pascoe Sabido, Researcher and Campaigner at the Corporate Europe Observatory, said:

“We’re facing a devastating climate emergency and a huge cost-of-living crisis, but rather than set up an energy poverty task force, the Commission is bringing in fossil fuel CEOs and experts who are telling it not to introduce a price cap or intervene in the energy market. The task force should be scrapped. If the Commission wants the industry’s  views, then they must set up a public hearing so we can all hear what they have to say, rather than keeping it behind closed doors.

“The European Commission has been in bed with these corporations for decades. If we want to end our reliance on gas, Russian or otherwise, then we need to end the relationship between the fossil fuel industry and decision-makers, cutting fossil fuel interests out of our political system. In short we need fossil free politics, Corporate Europe writes.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Montenegro–Italy electricity market coupling: Reshaping Southeast Europe’s power market to 2040

Electricity market coupling between Montenegro and Italy marks a structural break in the evolution of Southeast Europe’s power market. It is not simply a bilateral integration exercise or a technical extension of an existing submarine cable. It represents the...

How SEE electricity spreads shape Serbia’s industrial margins: A 2026–2030 competitiveness map

Serbia’s industrial competitiveness is increasingly shaped not by domestic conditions alone but by regional electricity spreads across Southeast Europe. The price difference between Hungary’s HUPX, Romania’s OPCOM, Bulgaria’s IBEX, Greece’s ADEX and Serbia’s SEEPEX sets the backdrop against which...

Regional power-flow shifts after the Pljevlja shutdown: Montenegro in a rewired Balkan energy landscape

The shutdown of Pljevlja transforms Montenegro’s internal energy balance, but its implications extend beyond national borders. In the interconnected Balkan power system, every addition or removal of a major unit reshapes flows, congestion points, trade patterns and price correlations....
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!