Why OE-governed quality assurance...

In every mature renewable market, there comes a moment when engineering quality—once assumed,...

Insurance, force majeure and...

In the early stages of Southeast Europe’s renewable expansion, wind investors focused primarily...

ESG, community strategy and...

For years, wind investment strategies in Southeast Europe focused almost exclusively on technical...

The grid-ready wind farm...

A decade ago, the success of a wind farm in Southeast Europe was...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsRegion: Effective carbon...

Region: Effective carbon pricing mechanism study

The study shows that under the recommended policy options, carbon pricing would have a very positive overall impact on the economy and employment in the contracting parties:

The Energy Community Secretariat released the study, prepared by Kantor and E3Modelling consultancies, whose objective is to assess and propose the design of an effective carbon pricing mechanism conducive to decarbonization of the contracting parties’ electricity sector, while avoiding and minimizing adverse social and economic impacts.

The study follows up on the contracting parties’ own decarbonization commitments in frameworks such as the UNFCCC and the Berlin Process, which call for giving carbon emissions a price. The EU accession candidates in particular are expected to introduce the EU Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) Directive at some point. The study also took into account the introduction of a carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), currently designed by the European Commission. The CBAM may affect electricity imports from the countries neighboring the EU, including the Energy Community.

The five policy scenarios elaborated in the study show that the optimal policy option would be a gradual introduction of carbon pricing coupled with full market integration. According to the study, carbon pricing should be introduced as early as possible in a coordinated way and gradually decrease the share of free carbon allowances over a transitional period. Different auctioning rates and timeframes would apply based on a contracting party’s exposure to carbon pricing, namely to help coal intensive countries adapt more easily and protect consumers from high electricity and gas prices.

The recommended policy scenario envisages five stages for joining the EU ETS, from internal carbon pricing and nationally traded allowances at the outset, to cross-border trading within the Energy Community and adhering to the EU ETS under a transitional regime and finally becoming a full member of the EU ETS. The study presents options for the use and redistribution of carbon revenues and policy measures to manage social concerns and decarbonization perspectives.

 

 

 

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Why OE-governed quality assurance is becoming the new currency of wind asset value in Southeast Europe

In every mature renewable market, there comes a moment when engineering quality—once assumed, often overlooked—becomes the defining currency of asset value. Southeast Europe is entering that moment now. Serbia, Romania, Croatia, and Montenegro are witnessing a scale-up in wind...

Insurance, force majeure and financial risk transfer — the new architecture of protection for wind investors in Southeast Europe

In the early stages of Southeast Europe’s renewable expansion, wind investors focused primarily on EPC contracts, turbine warranties, and revenue support mechanisms. Insurance was treated as a formal requirement—necessary for lenders, but rarely integrated into strategic project design. That...

ESG, community strategy and social license — the hidden financial drivers of wind success in Southeast Europe

For years, wind investment strategies in Southeast Europe focused almost exclusively on technical variables: resource quality, EPC pricing, grid access, and financing structure. But as markets mature, a new set of forces is emerging—less visible than capex or P50...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!