Regional power-flow shifts after...

The shutdown of Pljevlja transforms Montenegro’s internal energy balance, but its implications extend...

Private wind producers in...

Montenegro’s power system is undergoing a quiet reordering of influence. Where state hydro...

Balancing costs in Montenegro’s...

As Montenegro steps into a future without Pljevlja’s coal-fired stability, the cost of...

Montenegro’s power future: Transitioning...

Montenegro finds itself at a key inflection point. The only coal-fired thermal power...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsRegion, Directors of...

Region, Directors of power utilities EPS and ERS released a joint statement

Directors of power utilities EPS and ERS released a joint statement in which they said that the two companies will successfully complete the construction of hydropower plants on the upper course of the Drina river and will continue to seek opportunities to work together on new projects and investments.

The two officials discussed the implementation of the project for joint construction of HPPs on the Drina river, potential future joint projects, cross- border electricity transmission and the possibility of harmonizing of power plant overhauls between the two utilities.

Acting Director of EPS Milorad Grcic said that the two companies are working together on the Upper Drina HPP projects, the construction of three HPPs – Buk Bijela, Foca and Paunci worth some 520 million euros, pointing out the importance of such cooperation in times of energy crisis.

Acting Director of ERS Luka Petrovic said that the joint venture is already performing preliminary works on HPP Buk Bijela project, adding that the project will be realized despite political obstructions coming from BiH’s other entity – the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. He added that EPS is also interested in participation in HPP Boka project, joint developed by ERS and Montenegrin EPCG.

ERS and EPS can raise cooperation to a higher level in the field of investments, electricity trade and energy network development. They can harmonize the overhaul work plans for the power plants, which has now proved important, and could relieve both companies financially. The two companies are now starting projects that have been waiting for decades in order to secure the future energy independence of the two countries, which is the ultimate goal, Petrovic concluded.

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Regional power-flow shifts after the Pljevlja shutdown: Montenegro in a rewired Balkan energy landscape

The shutdown of Pljevlja transforms Montenegro’s internal energy balance, but its implications extend beyond national borders. In the interconnected Balkan power system, every addition or removal of a major unit reshapes flows, congestion points, trade patterns and price correlations....

Private wind producers in Montenegro: From peripheral players to system-defining actors

Montenegro’s power system is undergoing a quiet reordering of influence. Where state hydro once dominated unchallenged and Pljevlja provided the stable backbone, private wind producers are emerging as system-defining actors. They are reshaping generation patterns, altering the economics of...

Balancing costs in Montenegro’s post-coal power system

As Montenegro steps into a future without Pljevlja’s coal-fired stability, the cost of balancing becomes the defining economic metric of its power system. Balancing is never a simple technicality; it is the financial manifestation of volatility. When wind ramps...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!