Financing wind in Montenegro,...

The landscape of renewable finance in Southeast Europe has undergone a profound transformation....

How Southeast Europe’s grid...

Wind development in Southeast Europe is accelerating at a pace unimaginable only a...

Serbia–Romania–Croatia: The new triangular...

For years, the Iberian Peninsula defined what a wind powerhouse looked like inside...

The bankability gap in...

The transformation of Southeast Europe into a credible wind-investment region has been rapid,...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsMontenegro to import...

Montenegro to import 160 million euros worth of electricity in 2025

 

The Pljevlja thermal power plant will be shut down for several months in 2025 due to ecological reconstruction, which will force Montenegro to import large amounts of electricity, worth an estimated EUR 160 million, according to the energy and mining minister, Saša Mujović.

Power utility Elektroprivreda Crne Gore (EPCG), the operator of TPP Pljevlja, has started the ecological reconstruction to modernize the facility, align it with European emissions standards, and extend its lifespan. However, given that the 225 MW plant accounts for 40% of the country’s electricity production, its shutdown will require substantial imports.

EPCG officially launched the reconstruction project in April 2022, when it was announced it should last about two and a half years.

Now, during an air pollution panel discussion in the northern city of Bijelo Polje, minister Saša Mujović said that EPCG had not yet procured electricity for 2025, when the TPP Pljevlja would be reconstructed, Vijesti reported.

Mujović stressed that the proposal to subsidize electricity bills for residents of Bijelo Polje was unsustainable. He is almost certain that similar subsidies will be canceled next year for Pljevlja as well, which is considered by far the most polluted city in the country because of TPP Pljevlja and coal mining.

According to him, subsidies for Bijelo Polje for 2024 and 2025 are even more unsustainable with the planned shutdown of TPP Pljevlja, when Montenegro will be forced to import electricity.

About EUR 160 million will be spent on the imports, instead of making an income in the similar amount, which is a heavy burden for a poor country such as Montenegro, Mujović pointed out.

He says the fact that Montenegro has not yet secured electricity for 2025 makes him restless, adding that he will act on the issue very soon.

In 2023, EPCG posted an EUR 80 million profit. Montenegro usually generates enough electricity for its domestic consumption, and often exports surpluses. Sales abroad depend on the water levels, considering that more than 50% of electricity is generated in hydropower plants. In recent years, the country has exported several percent of its output.

Source: Balkan Green Energy News

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Financing wind in Montenegro, Serbia, Croatia and Romania — why international lenders are returning to Southeast Europe

The landscape of renewable finance in Southeast Europe has undergone a profound transformation. A decade ago, lenders viewed the region with a degree of caution, shaped by fluctuating regulatory frameworks, limited track records, and the perceived fragility of local...

How Southeast Europe’s grid bottlenecks will reshape project valuation, offtake strategy and EPC designs by 2030

Wind development in Southeast Europe is accelerating at a pace unimaginable only a decade ago, yet the region’s grid infrastructure is straining under the weight of its own renewable ambition. Serbia is preparing for multi-gigawatt expansion, Romania is restarting...

Serbia–Romania–Croatia: The new triangular wind corridor — is Southeast Europe becoming Europe’s next Iberia?

For years, the Iberian Peninsula defined what a wind powerhouse looked like inside Europe: strong resource, open land, grid-ready corridors, competitive auctions, and the steady inflow of international capital. Investors seeking scale, yield, and policy clarity migrated naturally towards...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!