Financing wind in Montenegro,...

The landscape of renewable finance in Southeast Europe has undergone a profound transformation....

How Southeast Europe’s grid...

Wind development in Southeast Europe is accelerating at a pace unimaginable only a...

Serbia–Romania–Croatia: The new triangular...

For years, the Iberian Peninsula defined what a wind powerhouse looked like inside...

The bankability gap in...

The transformation of Southeast Europe into a credible wind-investment region has been rapid,...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsMontenegro, The reconstruction...

Montenegro, The reconstruction of the TPP Pljevlja will continue in March

Work on the environmental reconstruction of the TPP Pljevlja, which was suspended for two months due to weather conditions, will continue during March.

This is what project manager Zoran Šljukić told Vijesti, explaining that in mid-March, part of the equipment from China worth around EUR 10 million will be delivered to TPP, and that installation will begin at the end of the month.

– The second round of equipment from China will arrive at the end of April and May, and the third by the end of August – said Å ljukić.

Work on the environmental reconstruction of the Pljevlja TPP began on April 27 last year, and is planned to last until October 15, 2024, when all plants are scheduled to be put into trial operation.

The reconstruction is being done by a consortium consisting of the Chinese company DEC International, Bemax, BBsolar and Permonte. The value of the works is around EUR 60 million without VAT, of which EUR 45 million refers to the basic contract, and EUR 15 million to the adaptation of the boiler.

The works so far have been carried out in accordance with the dynamic plan that we signed with the contractor. We have precisely defined dates for all phases of both design and execution of works. According to the dynamic plan, the commissioning of all plants is on October 15, 2024.

A major stoppage in the operation of the TPP is planned from March 1, 2024 to October 15. Then the biggest works and connection of all plants will be carried out. Considering the prices of electricity on the market, we will start discussions with the contractor and we will try to shorten that period of seven and a half months as much as possible.

In general, it can cost the electricity industry and the state a lot due to the necessity of importing a large amount of electricity during the downtime of the Pljevlja Thermal Power Plant – said Å ljukić.

After commissioning of the Thermal Power Plant on October 15, a trial run was conducted, during which possible errors will be eliminated and a performance test will be performed.

– The contractor will have to prove through a performance test that he has achieved what we asked for when issuing the tender, for the design and execution of the works. And that is that all plants meet the strictest European standards in terms of flue gas emissions – pointed out Å ljukić.

The biggest benefit of ecological reconstruction is the construction of a desulfurization plant, which, as Šljukić claims, will significantly improve the state of the environment in Pljevlja. Allegedly, emissions of sulfur oxides from the current 6.5 thousand milligrams will be reduced to below 130 milligrams.

Another important plant that will be built is a denitrification plant that will lower the emission of nitrogen oxides from the current 350 and 400 milligrams to less than 150 milligrams per cubic meter.

– We will also build a wastewater treatment plant. We will also install noise suppressors so that the unpleasant noise that occurs during the start-up or stoppage of the Thermal Power Plant will be eliminated. We will also build a permanent boiler house that will be a backup source for district heating of the city – said Å ljukić.

He pointed out that the installation of equipment is a more demanding job than previous works.

– So far, we have completed construction facilities in which mechanical and electrical equipment will be installed. The previous works were a prerequisite for starting the installation of the equipment.

The work is supervised by a team of 12 engineers.

Šljukić points out that the ecological reconstruction work, which is now being done at the Pljevlja Thermal Power Plant, was done in developed European countries 20 or 30 years ago.

– Unfortunately, Montenegro lags behind Europe, but when we do all this, we will have much less polluted air. As far as particulate matter is concerned, in 2009 we installed electrostatic precipitators that have far better performance than the plant that was installed when the TPP was put into operation in 1982. Current electrostatic precipitators lower the level of particulate matter below 20 milligrams per cubic meter.

Sign up for updates & special reports

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Financing wind in Montenegro, Serbia, Croatia and Romania — why international lenders are returning to Southeast Europe

The landscape of renewable finance in Southeast Europe has undergone a profound transformation. A decade ago, lenders viewed the region with a degree of caution, shaped by fluctuating regulatory frameworks, limited track records, and the perceived fragility of local...

How Southeast Europe’s grid bottlenecks will reshape project valuation, offtake strategy and EPC designs by 2030

Wind development in Southeast Europe is accelerating at a pace unimaginable only a decade ago, yet the region’s grid infrastructure is straining under the weight of its own renewable ambition. Serbia is preparing for multi-gigawatt expansion, Romania is restarting...

Serbia–Romania–Croatia: The new triangular wind corridor — is Southeast Europe becoming Europe’s next Iberia?

For years, the Iberian Peninsula defined what a wind powerhouse looked like inside Europe: strong resource, open land, grid-ready corridors, competitive auctions, and the steady inflow of international capital. Investors seeking scale, yield, and policy clarity migrated naturally towards...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!