Weekly energy market overview:...

During the second week of December, Brent oil futures for the Front Month...

European electricity prices: Weekly...

In the second week of December, average electricity prices fell in most major...

European electricity demand trends:...

During the week of December 8, electricity demand decreased across major European markets...

Europe: Solar and wind...

During the week of December 8, solar photovoltaic (PV) energy production increased in...
Supported byClarion Energy
HomeSEE Energy NewsMontenegro: Serbian EPS’...

Montenegro: Serbian EPS’ acquisition of EPCG would be wrong

In order to discussed possible cooperation between energy sectors of Montenegro and Serbia, President of the Board of Directors of Montenegrin state-owned power utility EPCG Milutin Djukanovic was in official visit to Serbia, where he met several officials.

However, former Montenegrin Minister of Economy Dragica Sekulic warned that, back in 2015, Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic announced the intentions of state-owned power utility EPS to acquire other power utilities in the region, primarily EPCG and ERS in the Republic of Srpska. She believes that it would be a bad move because Montenegro would become economically dependent on Serbia.

She reminds that when a country loses its energy independence it also loses its economic independence, especially bearing in mind the state of the Montenegrin economy caused by the coronavirus pandemic. If weak tourist seasons are taken into account, the importance of the energy sector in a crisis situation like this becomes even greater.

Serbian energy expert Mijat Lakicevic believes that any kind of cooperation with EPS would be disastrous for Montenegro and its citizens, considering that EPS is a bad company, with bad operation and bad management. He said that is beneficial to inject private capital into state-owned enterprises, but it should be done via public tender, where the seller chooses the best offer. EPS is not well managed, not enough is invested in the company, it operates for years with losses or with minimal profit, which is again the result of clever bookkeeping, and not the actual situation. He stressed that EPS urgently needs restructuring in order to become a good company, not acquisitions in the region.

 

Supported byOwner's Engineer banner

Recent News

Supported byspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Latest News

Supported byspot_img
Supported bySEE Energy News

Related News

Industrial self-generation and storage: Evolving from backup to strategic core

For most of Serbia’s industrial history, on-site power generation and storage occupied a marginal role. Diesel generators existed for emergencies, gas engines for niche applications, and electrical storage was largely absent. These assets were treated as insurance policies—rarely used,...

Industrial PPAs in Serbia: The hidden costs of underperformance without storage

Power purchase agreements have become one of the most discussed instruments in Serbia’s industrial energy transition. For manufacturers under pressure to decarbonise, stabilise costs and demonstrate long-term energy security, PPAs appear to offer a clean solution. A renewable generator...

Industrial power strategies in Serbia: From fixed pricing to managing shape risk

For most Serbian industrial consumers, power hedging has historically meant one thing: securing a fixed price. The logic was simple and rational in a system dominated by coal and hydropower. Electricity prices moved slowly, volatility was limited, and the...
Supported byVirtu Energy
error: Content is protected !!